Threads will start telling users when their posts are demoted

Threads will finally start giving users more visibility into when their accounts are penalized for breaking its rules. Meta is bringing its “Account Status” feature to Threads, which will enable people to see when the company has removed or demoted posts or handed out other penalties.

The change adds a layer of much-needed transparency to Threads, which already has a recommendation algorithm that can be hard for creators to understand. Earlier this year, Meta reversed course on whether it would recommend political content to Threads users after it tried to limit posts about elections and other “social” topics last year.

As on Instagram (and Facebook), Account Status allows Threads users to view “actions” Meta has taken against their account. It will indicate if a post has been removed, made less visible in other users’ feeds or deemed un-recommendable by Meta. It will also show if a user has been blocked from using certain features for breaking the platform’s rules.

If Meta has “actioned” your account for some reason, Account Status is also where you can request an appeal. The company says it will alert users once their report has been reviewed.

Account Status is starting to roll out now and is accessible from the “account” section in Threads’ settings menu.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/threads-will-start-telling-users-when-their-posts-are-demoted-204628224.html?src=rss 

Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky sentenced to 12 years for crypto fraud

CEO and founder of Celsius Network Alex Mashinsky has been sentenced to 12 years in prison by a US District Court. Celsius Network held about $25 billion in assets at its height, but was one of the many cryptocurrency operations to fail during 2022. Prosecutors were seeking two decades for Mashinsky, claiming he defrauded and misled customers about the status of his company’s CEL token.

“His crimes were not the product of negligence, naivete, or bad luck,” the attorneys said. “They were the result of deliberate, calculated decisions to lie, deceive, and steal in pursuit of personal fortune.”

After an initial not-guilty plea to seven criminal counts, the former cryptocurrency leader pled guilty to two of the fraud charges in December. As part of his plea deal, Mashinsky agreed not to appeal any sentence of 30 years or less.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/celsius-ceo-alex-mashinsky-sentenced-to-12-years-for-crypto-fraud-210415388.html?src=rss 

You can now claim your piece of Apple’s $95 million Siri privacy settlement

If you purchased an Apple device in the last 10 years, you might be able to receive some of the money from the company’s recently settled spying lawsuit. The original lawsuit claimed Apple was capturing sensitive information with its Siri voice assistant without users’ consent, and sending it to third-party contractors. The company agreed to settle the case for $95 million in January 2025, and thanks to the new landing page for the settlement, there’s now a way to file a claim on your own.

To file a claim, you you need to have bought an “iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, iMac, HomePod, iPod touch or Apple TV” between September 17, 2014 and December 31, 2024, and believe Siri accidentally activated on your device during a private conversation. From the $95 million Apple is paying out, you can receive up to $20 per device you believe called up Siri, provided you swear under oath it happened.

You have until July 2, 2025 to file your claim. If you qualify for the settlement, you may have already been notified with information on your Claim Identification Number and Claim Confirmation Code. If you haven’t received either but believe the settlement applies, you’re free to submit a claim on your own.

Apple claims that Siri was designed with protecting users’ privacy in mind, and agreeing to share data to improve the voice assistant — through your device’s Privacy & Security settings — never uses audio recordings or transcripts for anything other than training. In the case of newer devices, voice data is processed locally anyway, so agreeing to share your data is supposed to be the only way Apple could ever access it.

Given the growing focus on AI, and the large amounts of data needed to train it, there’s good reason to be skeptical about where companies are getting their training material. Apple prefers to get its customers consent, but the company has turned to new sources to help its AI research along. For example, Apple recently disclosed that it will start using the images captured for its Street View-esque feature in Apple Maps to train its models.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/you-can-now-claim-your-piece-of-apples-95-million-siri-privacy-settlement-213020351.html?src=rss 

Palworld removes Pal gliding as it continues its legal battle with Nintendo

Nintendo’s lawyers have killed another Palworld gameplay mechanic. Pocketpair issued a patch on Thursday that changes how gliding works in the cheeky “Pokémon with guns” satire.

You can still glide in Palworld, but you can no longer use your Pal to do so. Starting with patch v0.5.5, you can only soar with a boring, inanimate glider in your inventory. Although Glider Pals can still passively buff gliding, it’s no longer as fun as flinging out the creature and using their aerodynamics to cross a ravine.

As you’d expect, Pocketpair’s decision traces back to its legal defense. Nintendo and The Pokémon Company sued the developer in Japan last year, claiming Palworld infringes on multiple patents. Since then, Nintendo has filed a flurry of patent applications in the US in an apparent scheme to go global with its legal assault.

“We understand that this will be disappointing for many, just as it is for us,” Pocketpair wrote. “But we hope our fans understand that these changes are necessary in order to prevent further disruptions to the development of Palworld.”

Pocketpair

Today’s update isn’t the first to bork the game to try to stave off the Mario maker’s legal barrage. In November, Palworld removed the ability to summon Pals by throwing Spheres, one of the game’s more Pokémon-esque details. But gliding is a much less established Pokémon gameplay mechanic. On top of that, it’s a common one in the industry, found in franchises as diverse as Far Cry, Fortnite and Batman: Arkham.

The lawsuit sparks fears that industry behemoths using the courts to snuff out smaller competitors will become more widespread. “Video game patent mechanics has to utterly die given how it’s either abused by major companies to cripple any competition or utterly wasted like with the Nemesis system from Middle-earth games,” u/DenseCalligrapher219 opined on Reddit.

Another way to view Nintendo’s move is that it masks the stench of a stagnant franchise. “If Nintendo is going to sabotage other Pokémon-like games, the least they could do is get Game Freak to develop a Pokémon game that isn’t garbage,” wrote u/VacantThoughts. “The world’s biggest franchise with the world’s laziest half-ass devs.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nintendo/palworld-removes-pal-gliding-as-it-continues-its-legal-battle-with-nintendo-200644597.html?src=rss 

Meta will test video ads on Threads

Instagram’s Threads app began testing advertisements for its users at the start of this year, and the social platform is already ramping up its monetization efforts. Meta announced at IAB NewFronts that it will start testing video ads on Threads. The company didn’t get specific about the size or scale of this preliminary test, but said that a “small number” of advertisers will trial 19:9 or 1:1 video ad creatives placed between typical posts in users’ feeds.

At the NewFronts event, where social media companies can pitch themselves to advertisers, Meta also said that it is trying out a new ad option centered around Instagram Reels. It is developing Reels trending ads that will be shown next to some of the service’s most popular videos.

Basically, Meta is following the same trajectory with its Instagram networks that it did with Facebook: making it less and less enjoyable to actually socialize with your connections.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/meta-will-test-video-ads-on-threads-192213050.html?src=rss 

Wikipedia’s owner challenges categorization rules under UK’s Online Safety Act

The Wikimedia Foundation, hosts of the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, is challenging an aspect of the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act (OSA). The law aims to protect users from harmful online content by imposing restrictions and fines on large internet platforms such as social media companies. While the law was originally passed in 2023, enforcement and categorization of companies subject to the law are only taking shape now.

The law sorts online platforms into categories that are then met with varying levels of restrictions and enforcement. Wikimedia is specifically challenging the “categorisation regulations” under the law, arguing that Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, is using a flawed and vague system of metrics to judge what category a platform falls into.

Under the current definition, metrics like number of UK users and the ability to forward or share content make it more likely that Wikipedia would be considered a higher-risk “Category 1” platform. This would put Wikipedia in the same bucket as Facebook, X, YouTube and other enormous social platforms. 

The Wikimedia Foundation’s lead counsel Phil Bradley-Schmieg shared in a blog post that the foundation had been working with UK regulators for years in an attempt to clarify the rules in a manner the foundation felt would be more fair.

Platforms that are recognized as Category 1 are held to more stringent requirements governing how quickly they remove harmful content, ensuring proper age verification, preventing cyberbullying and more. The Wikimedia Foundation is arguing that Wikipedia should not be lumped into Category 1, as it is a nonprofit, ad-free and mostly volunteer-operated service.

In another blog post, the Wikimedia Foundation lays out its concerns, saying that these restrictions “would be a substantial challenge to our resources to meet the strict reporting and compliance obligations,” and that the fines threatened by Category 1 classification could lead to “disempowering users who wish to keep their identity private.”

The foundation made clear that they ultimately support regulations that could improve online safety. “Given that the OSA intends to make the UK a safer place to be online,”Bradley-Schmieg wrote “it is particularly unfortunate that we must now defend the privacy and safety of Wikipedia’s volunteer editors from flawed legislation.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/wikipedias-owner-challenges-categorization-rules-under-uks-online-safety-act-175128560.html?src=rss 

Chrome will now use Gemini Nano to catch scams

Google just announced an upgrade to Chrome’s Enhanced Protection feature. On desktop, the browser now uses Gemini Nano to protect users against remote tech support scams. According to Google, the on-device large language model allows Chrome to protect people against scams the company hasn’t seen before. 

“[Gemini Nano] is perfect for this use because of its ability to distill the varied, complex nature of websites, helping us adapt to new scam tactics more quickly,” Google says, adding it hopes to this bring the feature to Android devices soon. The company plans to use this same AI approach against a greater variety of scams in the future as well.

In the meantime, Android users can look forward to stronger protection against scams that use Chrome notifications as an attack vector. Google is once again turning to machine learning to offer this feature. “When Chrome’s on-device machine learning model flags a notification, you’ll receive a warning with the option to either unsubscribe or view the content that was blocked,” Google explains. “And if you decide the warning was shown incorrectly, you can choose to allow future notifications from that website.”

Fighting scams was a major focus for Google last year. In May, for instance, the company previewed a system for delivering real-time scam alerts during phone calls. More recently, the company introduced a suite of safety features for Messages. As a result of its efforts, Google says it’s preventing hundreds of millions of scam-related results from reaching its users.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/chrome-will-now-use-gemini-nano-to-catch-scams-170057893.html?src=rss 

Razer will sell you a $230 head cushion speaker, in this economy

Razer just started selling a unique speaker called the Clio. It attaches to a gaming chair and doubles as a head cushion. It boasts some nifty tech and is based on a concept design dating back to early 2023. The company promises “headset-like immersive audio without the constraints of wearing one.” To that end, the speaker integrates with THX spatial audio and uses two 43mm full-range drivers.

These drivers are angled so they hit the ears “for an intimate listening experience.” The Clio works on its own, but can be paired with other audio devices for even more immersion. Razer says it works great when integrated with pre-existing front speakers. This allows for a 5.1 surround sound experience, with the Clio acting as the rear speaker.

The speaker connects wirelessly and reduces latency via proprietary software called Razer HyperSpeed. It also works with Bluetooth for compatibility with Android and iOS devices. The battery lasts for around 14 hours per charge, though it doesn’t come with the required USB-C cable.

As for the head cushion part of the equation, the Clio boasts memory foam that “cradles the head and neck for a comfortable listening experience.” It also has nylon straps for adjustments. It’s compatible with most high-back gaming chairs.

Now for the bad news. This is an expensive speaker. The Razer Clio costs a whopping $230. It’s available to order right now, with shipments going out on May 16.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/razer-will-sell-you-a-230-head-cushion-speaker-in-this-economy-171726271.html?src=rss 

The enshitification of YouTube’s full album playlists

So a professional dominatrix specializing in foot worship signs into her YouTube account for the first time in seventeen years and compiles over 900 playlists, including the debut LP of progressive math-rock band 90 Day Men, an album from hyperpop/chiptune darling Saoirse Dream and portions of the original soundtrack from early 2000s anime Chobits. There’s no punchline to that one. Let me explain.

Despite an entirely separate paid product — YouTube Music — vanilla YouTube’s sometimes spotty enforcement of copyright has made it a goldmine for music, especially the kind that’s niche, and possibly unavailable on legal streamers. Dedicated channels for screamo, doom metal or acid jazz, for instance, are regularly uploading rare releases, and searching for nearly any artist and “full album” will typically return the desired result no matter how obscure. In some cases, albums are uploaded as a single, lengthy video with timestamps indicating where one track ends and the next begins; in others, individual tracks are uploaded and compiled as playlists.

In recent months, however, countless tainted playlists have cropped up in YouTube search results. Engadget compiled a sample of 100 channels (there are undoubtedly many, many more) engaged in what we’ll refer to as playlist stuffing. These had between 30 and 1,987 playlists each — 58,191 in total. The overwhelming majority of these stuffed playlists contain an irrelevant, nearly hour-long video simply titled “More.”

Engadget

The robotic narration of “More” begins: “Cryptocurrency investing, when approached with a long-term perspective, can be a powerful way to build wealth.” You’d be forgiven for assuming its aim is to direct unwitting listeners to a shitcoin pump-and-dump. But over the next 57 minutes and 55 seconds, it meanders incoherently between a variety of topics like affiliate marketing, making a website and search engine optimization. (Here’s the entire transcript if you find yourself pathologically curious.) What’s odd is there’s no link to any scam page, no specific business the video directs a listener to patronize. Its description simply reads “Other stuff I’ve recorded and edited that I hadn’t released until now, a special for my biggest fans with footage never seen before!”

For all its supposed advice on making easy money online, its best example isn’t anything said in the video, it’s that “More” has amassed nearly 7.5 million views at the time of this writing — and it’s monetized.

It’s far from the only video of its kind. Many longer albums, like Mal Blum’s You Look A Lot Like Me, Titus Andronicus’s The Most Lamentable Tragedy and Slugdge’s The Cosmic Cornucopia are appear as stuffed playlists with “More,” “Unreleased” and “Full Album.” Both are similar marketing slop; they have 3.7 and 3.5 million views, respectively.

Unscrupulous artists also seem to engage, on a smaller scale, in a less obtuse sort of playlist stuffing. The channel Ultra Sounds has garnered 4.1 million views on its song “The Pause,” after inserting it into — among other places — the Nine Inch Nails album Add Violence. Anastasia Coope’s Darning Woman and 1991, an album by shoegaze pioneers Drop Nineteens, are not made better for the inclusion of Murat Başkaya, an apparent Turkish rapper. Electronic dance group The Daring Ones have added a few hundred thousand views to several of their tracks by stuffing them into a variety of playlists, including one of last month’s new Viagra Boys record. Engadget attempted to contact these musicians on their content strategy but has not heard back.

“More” takes advantage of a very simple UI quirk. Besides there being no easy way to tell how many playlists a YouTube account has made (it loads them 30 at a time on scroll), search results show only the first two tracks of a given playlist. “More” is almost invariably inserted as track three. Unwitting listeners who click and tab away are greeted with irrelevant marketing jargon around seven minutes later — a scenario reflected in the often bewildered comments beneath the video.

Playlist stuffing would seem to contravene YouTube’s policies on playlists and deceptive practices, which proscribe “playlists with titles or descriptions that mislead viewers into thinking they’re about to view videos different than what the playlist contains.” A glance at the channel to which “More” was uploaded provides a hint that something more insidious is at play than just playlist stuffing for ad revenue.

“More” is not the only video on the channel Hangmeas. The channel description states “I produce my own custom music videos with footage I record around East Asia where me and the locals sing and dance to traditional music from their cultures,” and sure enough its other two uploads are songs from Cambodian musicians — uploaded 18 years ago. The army of channels posting stuffed playlists containing “More” are all similarly ancient. One, kcnmttcnn, was created on December 26, 2005, only a few months after YouTube itself first launched. It now hosts over 900 playlists. The vast majority of channels engaged in this activity were created in 2006, and the youngest was claimed in February of 2009. In all likelihood, these accounts were abandoned long ago and have since been compromised, either by whoever is behind “More” or by a third party which sold access to these accounts to them.

Just like Hangmeas, several of these possibly compromised accounts have their channel descriptions, links — like the Myspace account for the aforementioned dominatrix — and old uploads intact. Viewing them in aggregate triggers a strange kind of melancholy, like finding the photo album of someone else’s family in a thrift store. Here’s two friends go-karting down a stretch of farmland; here’s a girl sledding down a very short hill; here’s 11 minutes off an online game of Uno; here’s two girls trying on hats in a department store; here’s Muse playing “Time Is Running Out” in Paris, 2006, rendered in such poor quality it could be literally any show at all. This one’s just called “David.” Its description reads “I’m cool.”

Unfortunately none of these channels had extant contact information. It’s impossible to know how the subjects of these videos feel about their old digital selves being leveraged for playlist stuffing. We can’t even know how many of these people are still alive.

Somehow, a raft of accounts old enough to vote logged back in, probably from very different parts of the world than where they originated, and churned out playlists at a rate no human being could possibly hope to achieve. YouTube, it seems, did not find this suspicious. We reached out to YouTube for comment and did not receive comment by time of publication.

Yes, amateurish, nearly two decade-old footage harkens to a simpler time, when being able to upload a video that the whole world could see — though much more likely it would be viewed by a couple of your friends, and then one reporter 18 years later — was still exciting. But the history of the internet seems to be contained here: The simple joy of connection, neglected on a megacorp’s servers, slowly co-opted by anyone trying to make a quick and dishonest buck.

Author’s note: I’ve included a list of the potentially compromised accounts here; if you happen to be the owner of one of them, I’d love to hear from you.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/youtube/the-enshitification-of-youtubes-full-album-playlists-172934629.html?src=rss 

Ireland is pitching a law to force big tech companies to vet ads before publication

Ireland has pitched a law to force tech companies to vet ads before publishing them, according to reporting by Financial Times. This is part of a larger push by the EU Commission to make tech entities responsible for financial fraud that occurs on their platforms. It also comes as President Trump has begun pushing the EU to scale back regulation of big American tech companies.

While a proposal by the EU Commission would indeed put companies on the hook for financial fraud, Ireland’s plan hopes to get ahead of all that. It looks to stop fraudulent ads before they are even published. The Irish finance ministry submitted an amendment to the current EU proposal that would force tech platforms to check the legitimacy of advertisers before posting their ads.

Ireland leads charge to force Big Tech to vet financial ads for scams https://t.co/nqOXZjGOOt via @ft

— Jude Webber (@jude_webber) May 8, 2025

The amendment would also make it so only registered financial service providers could post these types of ads. The Bank of Ireland says that more than 75 percent of losses last year came from investment fraud that were often linked to ads placed on social media. These ads can be posted at any time and, more importantly, taken down at any time. This allows the publishers to avoid legal scrutiny after the damage has been done. Data indicates that online scammers defrauded Europeans out of nearly $5 billion in 2022.

“We can’t leave glaringly obvious holes in legislation that are allowing criminals to defraud people of their life savings,” said Regina Doherty, an Irish lawmaker.

Google has declined to discuss this measure, but told FT that it fights “financial fraud in ads through our tools, people and policies.” It is true that it operates a financial services certification program to help combat fraud. Meta has declined to comment. We’ve pinged both companies and will update this post if we hear back.

Around half of EU countries have expressed support for Ireland’s proposed amendment, though there is a hurdle to overcome. The EU Commission already has a provision in the Digital Services Act that says that tech companies aren’t required to broadly monitor content, though proponents of the Irish initiative have countered that the requirement to vet advertisers could be designed in such a way that conforms with current law.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/ireland-is-pitching-a-law-to-force-big-tech-companies-to-vet-ads-before-publication-154946970.html?src=rss 

Generated by Feedzy
Exit mobile version