Kalakshar US

Darksiders 4 is officially coming. During the THQ Nordic Digital Showcase on Friday, we got a glimpse at the next game in the hack and slash action-adventure franchise, alongside trailers for roughly a dozen other games that are in the works, including Reanimal and The Eternal Life of Goldman. It’s been a while since we’ve seen a new mainline Darksiders title from developer Gunfire Games, and while the fourth entry follows 2019’s prequel, Darksiders Genesis, the announcement says it will “continue where the original Darksiders game left off.”

Darksiders 4 features all four Horsemen, and you’ll get to choose which one to play as. It features “combat, traversal and puzzle solving in a lore rich post apocalyptic world.” The teaser doesn’t give us much information beyond that and there’s no release date just yet, but we do know it’ll be available on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S and PC.

If you missed the showcase, you can catch up here on everything that was announced (like that new Spongebob game). And according to THQ Nordic, that’s only half of what it has up its sleeve. At the end of the showcase, the publisher said a total of 28 games are currently in development, with 15 we still have yet to see.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/darksiders-4-was-not-on-my-2025-bingo-card-204611075.html?src=rss 

Scientists are sending several strains of disease-causing bacteria to the International Space Station as part of the Crew-11 mission. This experiment isn’t the plot to some cheesy horror film, but a scientific investigation from the Sheba Medical Center in Israel and the US-based company Space Tango with the goal of better understanding how bacteria spread and behave under extreme conditions. The experiment includes E. coli, along with bacteria that cause diseases like typhoid fever and the infection commonly known as Salmonella.

After reaching the ISS, the experiment will see the different bacterial species grow before being returned to Earth to be tested against counterparts that were grown simultaneously in an identical lab under normal conditions. The experiment’s results will help scientists understand how bacteria respond to zero gravity and could help astronauts, who are more prone to infections during missions due to stress, exposure to radiation and changes in gravity. However, the research could prove useful beyond space missions. With the onset of superbugs that show antibiotic resistance, the experiment could reveal ways to combat more robust bacterial strains.

“This experiment will allow us, for the first time, to systematically and molecularly map how the genetic expression profile of several pathogenic bacteria changes in space,” Ohad Gal-Mor, head of the Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory at Sheba, said in a press release. 

The medical center previously conducted a test with bacteria in simulated space conditions, which showed a reduced ability to develop antibiotic resistance, but the latest experiment is the first one to take place at the ISS. It’s not the first time scientists have studied bacteria’s behavior in microgravity conditions, since researchers from the University of Houston tested how E. coli would grow in a simulated space environment back in 2017. More recently, NASA launched an experiment tasking astronauts to swab the interiors of the ISS and test them for evidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/nasas-latest-mission-to-the-iss-features-a-bacterial-experiment-195004174.html?src=rss 

X isn’t off the hook yet when it comes to a significant legal case about child sex abuse content on its platform. On Friday, a circuit judge from the US Court of Appeals ruled that X Corp. has to again face claims that it was negligent in taking down child sex abuse content and didn’t have an effective reporting infrastructure for these offenses.

This ruling from Judge Danielle Forrest is the latest step in a lawsuit filed in 2021 against Twitter, before it was rebranded to X. The suit lists two underage boys as the plaintiffs and alleges Twitter, now X, “slow-walked its response to reports about, and did not immediately remove from the platform, pornographic content that a trafficker had coerced plaintiffs into producing.”

A previous decision with a three-judge panel unanimously decided that X was legally immune thanks to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which offers wide-reaching protections to online platforms from the content that’s posted by its users. This latest decision from Judge Forrest agrees with parts of the previous ruling, but claims that X was negligent in this case and has to defend itself against the lawsuit’s claims that the platform makes it “too difficult to report child pornography that is posted on Twitter.”

The case revolves around a 13-year-old and a 14-year-old boy who were tricked by online sex traffickers into sending sexually explicit photos, according to the lawsuit. The illegal content was then posted to Twitter, and the 13-year-old filed a report against it through Twitter’s content reporting interface, as detailed in the suit. The boy’s mother also filed a report, didn’t receive anything but an automated response, and had to follow up before receiving a response that Twitter didn’t find any policy violations and wouldn’t take further action, according to the lawsuit. The suit claimed that Twitter eventually removed the post nine days after the initial report, suspended the poster’s account and reported the content to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which is required by federal law. The lawsuit could set a major precedent in how social media platforms operate, especially if it makes it to the Supreme Court, but X will first have to defend itself against these claims again in district court thanks to this latest decision.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/x-has-to-prove-it-wasnt-negligent-when-removing-csam-from-its-site-173645506.html?src=rss 

YouTube has started testing a new collaboration feature, similar to Instagram’s and TikTok’s. A Google employee explained on YouTube Help that it will allow creators to add collaborators to a video so that they can be recommended to each other’s audiences. The test is only available to a small group of creators for now, but it sounds like YouTube has plans to expand its availability in the future. Lindsey Gamble, an influencer marketing consultant and advisor, has posted a screenshot showing how the experimental feature works on Threads.

As you can see in the image Gamble posted, adding collaborators would show their names next to the creators on their channel. If there are too many, at least on mobile, the collaborators would show as “…and more” next to the creator’s name. Tapping on it would bring up the list of people involved in the project, with the Subscribe button next to their name. 

On Instagram and TikTok, the creator who uploads the content will have to invite another account as a collaborator, who’ll then have to approve the invitation. That’ll most likely be the case here, as well, in order to ensure that creators don’t randomly add other users to their videos. It’s not clear, however, whether the collaborators can see details typically reserved for the uploader’s eyes. As with any experimental YouTube and Google product, the company will be taking the testers’ feedback into account before deciding if it’ll give the feature a wide release.

fff

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/youtube/youtube-is-testing-instagram-style-collabs-153046187.html?src=rss 

Whew, it’s been a crazy few weeks for us at Engadget. School may still be out, but there’s no summer break for the steady stream of new gadgets coming across our desks. I’ll forgive you if you missed a review or two over the last few weeks — we’ve been busy. Here’s a quick rundown of what we’ve been up to, just in time for you to catch up over the weekend. 

Samsung Z Flip 7

Alongside the Z Fold 7, Samsung debuted an updated version of its more compact foldable, the Z Flip 7. UK bureau chief Mat Smith noted that the company managed to provide a substantial overhaul, but there are some areas that were left untouched. “Certain aspects of the Flip 7 are lacking, most notably the cameras, which haven’t been changed since last year,” he said. “Samsung also needs to put more work into its Flex Window.”

Oakley Meta glasses

Meta’s first non-Ray-Ban smart glasses have arrived. While we wait for a more affordable version to get here, senior editor Karissa Bell put the white and gold option through its paces. “While I don’t love the style of the Oakley Meta HSTN frames, Meta has shown that it’s been consistently able to improve its glasses,” she wrote. “The upgrades that come with the new Oakley frames aren’t major leaps, but they deliver improvements to core features.”

DJI Osmo 360

Reporter Steve Dent argued that DJI is finally giving Insta360 some competition in the 360-degree action cam space. The design and performance of the Osmo 360 are great, but the problem comes when it’s time to edit. “The all-new DJI Studio app also needs some work,” he explained. “For a first effort, though, the Osmo 360 is a surprisingly solid rival to Insta360’s X5.”

Nothing Phone 3

Nothing’s first “true flagship” phone has arrived, ready to take on the likes of the Pixel 9 and Galaxy S25. Despite the company’s lofty chatter, Mat argued the Nothing Phone 3 is hampered by a lower-power chip and disappointing cameras. “While I want Nothing to continue experimenting with its phones, it should probably prioritize shoring up the camera performance first,” he said.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8

Samsung debuted a big update to its Galaxy Watch line when it unveiled the Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7. Senior buying advice reporter Amy Skorheim spent two weeks testing the new wearable, which impressed her so much she declared it was “Samsung’s best smartwatch in years.” You can read her in-depth review here.

Everything else we tested

Here are the rest of the reviews you might have missed:

Legion Go S powered by SteamOS by Sam Rutherford

Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 by Billy Steele 

NordVPN, Proton VPN, ExpressVPN and Surfshark VPN reviews by Sam Chapman

s.p.l.i.t by Jessica Conditt

Porsche 911 GTS by Tim Stevens

iOS 26 beta by Mat Smith

Donkey Kong Bananza by Nathan Ingraham

Anker Nebula X1 by Steve Dent

Waterfield Magnetic Case for Switch 2 by Sam Rutherford

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/engadget-review-recap-samsung-z-flip-7-oakley-meta-glasses-dji-osmo-360-and-more-130012194.html?src=rss 

Instagram is no longer allowing public accounts to go live if they have less than 1,000 followers. Users have been reporting over the past few days that their accounts aren’t eligible for Live broadcast on the app anymore. “We changed the requirements to use this feature,” reads the notice that pops up when people try to host a livestream broadcast to their followers. “Only public accounts with 1,000 followers or more will be able to create live videos.” Now Meta has confirmed the new eligibility requirement to Engadget.

The company told us that it started implementing the new rule in order to ensure that it’s providing the best experience for creators that host Live broadcasts and that it’s driving improvements in the feature’s overall usage experience. It didn’t clarify why Instagram won’t be able to provide the best experience if users with below 1,000 followers can livestream, as well. 

Meta also told us that the new requirement applies not just to public, but also to private accounts. However, the change has only started rolling out to private accounts, which is likely why its notice states that only public accounts with 1,000 followers or more can go Live for now. That likely means Instagram is killing the ability to do livestreams for up to three close friends only, which was a feature the platform launched in 2024. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/instagram-public-accounts-with-less-than-1000-followers-can-no-longer-go-live-133049758.html?src=rss