Volkswagen ID.Buzz review: A head-turning EV microbus with unfortunate flaws

While we’re still waiting for a true electric minivan to hit the US, VW’s ID.Buzz microbus is close. It’s a unique family hauler that’ll definitely get your neighbors buzzing. No, seriously, during my week of testing I had over a dozen conversations with strangers who were fascinated by the ID.Buzz. One of my neighbors stopped their car dramatically when they saw it, backed up, and just had to give me a thumbs up and praise it as “cool as hell.”

My kids were similarly enamored, they loved its cute design and enormous interior space. In many ways, it’s the family EV I’ve been dreaming of — something that could comfortably seat seven people and carry tons of cargo for road trips. Unfortunately, its high $60,000 starting price and relatively lackluster 234 mile range hold it back from true greatness.

Really, though, those issues were obvious when VW announced its US launch details for the ID.Buzz last year. I was more intrigued to see if it was a complete flop for VW, or if there was something compelling about it despite those flaws. After testing the ID.Buzz for a week, I’ve noticed one surprising thing: It makes everyone smile. It may not look exactly like VW’s classic ’60s microbus, but it elicits a similar amount of joy. And that’s refreshing compared to the response I’ve seen to other large EVs like the Cybertruck (my son calls it the “ugly truck”) and the ridiculous Hummer EV.

Sure, it’s sort of coasting on vibes, but the VW ID.Buzz still has plenty of practical benefits if you don’t mind the high price and charging a bit more often during road trips. And as I’ll explain below, it’ll likely be an enticing option once it hits the used market in a few years.

What is the VW ID.Buzz?

Most cynically, the ID.Buzz is an attempt to milk the brand nostalgia for VW’s hippy-era Type 2 microbus. VW never quite gave up on those vehicles, but its later models dropped the cute rounded aesthetic and looked more like commercial vans. What makes the ID.Buzz truly interesting is that it transforms a beloved classic into a cutting-edge EV, with an enormous infotainment screen and modern features like adaptive cruise control.

It also makes a great first impression, since it doesn’t look like anything else on the road. There’s a rounded front end that evokes the playfulness of the original model, and its two-tone color design (on some trims) simply pops among a sea of boring (and often white) cars in traffic. Sure, VW has done this before, but the Buzz is still a great reminder that EVs don’t have to look like traditional vehicles. There’s no front engine to worry about, just a big battery and electric motors. In the Buzz’s case, you can choose from rear-wheel drive and “4Motion” all-wheel drive dual motors, delivering 282 and 335 horsepower, respectively.

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

The ID.Buzz offers the seating of a minivan — with room for six to seven people depending on your configuration, and convenient sliding second-row doors — plus the height and storage capacity more akin to cargo vans. With all of its seats up, the Buzz offers an acceptable 18.6 cubic feet of storage, which is enough for a typical grocery run or a stroller and a diaper bag. Fold the third row down, though, and you get a far more useful 75.5 cubic feet of space. You could also remove the second and third row of seats entirely to get a massive 145.5 cubic feet of space.

Funny enough, you could technically fit three people into the Buzz’s third row, but US regulators have taken issue since that row only has two seatbelts. VW has recalled existing vehicles and says it’ll be adding “unpadded trim parts” to reduce the seating area. Yes, it’s the rare recall where you’ll actually lose a bit of functionality in the name of safety. (Nobody is actually forcing Buzz owners to do that, though…)

As for other niceties, the ID.Buzz offers an enormous 12.9-inch infotainment screen (I’ve never seen Apple CarPlay look so big before), a smaller driving information screen behind the steering wheel and an optional heads-up display. There’s also a panoramic sunroof option, which can’t be opened but can be tinted to look opaque on demand. Our review unit didn’t have that sunroof, unfortunately, and the interior certainly felt a bit gloomier because of that. If I were seriously considering the ID.Buzz, I’d argue the sunroof a is requirement. (Admittedly, it could be a problem if you’re trying to get babies and toddlers to sleep, since the interior will never truly get dark. But kids outgrow napping fairly quickly, and it’s easy to find canopies for car seats.)

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

What’s good about the VW ID.Buzz?

The best thing about the ID.Buzz is the vibe you get while driving it around town. People will stop and stare at it, kids will point at it excitedly and harried parents will approach it like the monolith from 2001. It’s as if VW’s designers took Marie Kondo’s advice to heart: It simply sparks joy. As I dropped off my son at daycare one morning, one of the school’s admins dragged me outside and demanded to see the interior. “I wish I could retire in this thing and travel the country,” she said.

The ID.Buzz is also very capable as an EV. Despite its large size, it’s quick to accelerate and incredibly comfortable on the highway and bumpy roads. Parking was a bit annoying, but the Buzz was also easy to maneuver thanks to the large infotainment screen, which could display both single-camera and 360-degree overhead views at the same time. I had a much easier time backing into spots than I did with much smaller cars.

The Buzz’s large second row could easily fit three carseats side-by-side, assuming you get the models with the middle bench seat. I was able to hook up my son’s carseat and my daughter’s booster chair in a few minutes, without the finger-cramping I usually experience with my Volvo XC90 SUV. (One downside to the second row? You can’t open its windows fully, instead only a smaller section of the windows open up.)

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

I also instantly appreciated the Buzz’s enormous storage area, as it was able to fit a large pile of charity donations that were sitting in my garage. That included a bike trailer for kids as well as an old high chair. We were able to fully load up the trunk with the third-row seats down, and there was still room in the second row for additional gear. That trip likely would have been possible with my Volvo, but it would have involved cramming in large items more creatively. With the ID.Buzz, I didn’t break a sweat.

Now that I’m several years into being a suburban dad with two kids (sigh), I’ve learned to appreciate the benefits of less flashy and more practical transportation. And there’s no doubt the ID.Buzz is useful. In addition to that donation drop-off, I was also able to comfortably pile my parents into the Buzz along with my kids for a day trip. My dad thought the third row was absolutely huge, and my mom had no trouble sitting in the second row alongside the child and booster seats.

There’s no other EV that’s this flexible. The Rivian R1S is far more expensive, and the Kia EV9 is great but doesn’t offer as much storage. And neither of those cars have minivan-like sliding doors, which are a life-saver in tight parking spots. There’s no true EV minivan in the US at this point, the best you can get is the hybrid Toyota Sienna (which I loved) and the plug-in hybrid Pacifica (which I had to dump because of Chrysler’s terrible build quality).

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

What’s bad about the VW ID.Buzz?

The hardest pill to swallow with the Buzz is its $60,000 starting price, which can escalate to over $70,000 if you want all the fixins. Basically, it’s a luxury curiosity for those who can afford it, not something that’s easily attainable for everyone. Its price could be excused if the Buzz also offered everything we see in comparable EVs, but its short 234-mile range is just inexcusable when the EV9 can reach 309 miles for around the same price. For such a large vehicle, you’d think VW would be able to stuff in more batteries.

Realistically, the Buzz’s range only becomes a problem during long road trips, where you’ll have to charge more often compared to other EVs. But that can be an annoying process, since you’ll typically have to spend at least half an hour at a charging station to get ready for the next leg of your trip. VW says the Buzz can go from 10 to 80 percent charge on a 200 kW DC fast charger in 30 minutes, but those aren’t available everywhere. One hour of level 2 AC charging got me 12 percent of additional battery life, while level 1 trickle charging at home added 20 percent of juice over 14 hours.

It’s also worth noting that range estimates vary dramatically in cold weather, or if you’re cranking the Buzz’s heat or air conditioning. That’s why it’s always smart to aim for as much range as you can, even if you don’t think you’ll be driving that much.

Volkswagen

Beyond the obvious problems, I also hated the Buzz’s capacitive touch controls, which are spread across its steering wheel buttons, infotainment center and window controls. While there are indentations and a bit of haptic feedback when you hit something, like pumping up the volume or choosing the next music track via the steering wheel, it’s hard to differentiate those controls from nearby capacitive buttons. It’s far too easy to tap the cruise control functions while you’re just trying to change the volume, and vice versa.

Since it’s hard to actually feel where certain buttons are, I found myself looking down to make sure I was hitting the right option, which is something I absolutely hate doing while driving. Similarly, trying to adjust HVAC settings on the bottom portion of the infotainment screen can easily trigger the capacitive buttons below them, which was another reason I had to occasionally take my eyes off the road. Thankfully, VW appears to be focusing on physical buttons for future vehicles, but ID.Buzz owners are still left with a frustrating interface.

The ID.Buzz’s rearview mirror controls… how do they work?

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Here are just some of the ways the capacitive buttons infuriated me:

It’s difficult to turn on the cruise control and adjust your speed without looking down.

It’s tough to control the rear windows from the driver’s seat, since it involves hitting a capacitive “Rear” button. There are only two controls for windows, so you have to choose between controlling the front and second-row windows. Even more annoying, the Buzz would sometimes disable the rear window option after a few seconds.

I spent at least 10 minutes trying to figure out how the rear-view mirrors are controlled, and I still have no clue. It’s an inscrutable combination of a joy-stick, turning dial and capacitive controls.

Should you buy the VW ID.Buzz?

At this point, given its price and range, the VW ID.Buzz just doesn’t make sense for most people. If you really want a three-row EV, you’ll likely be better served by the Kia EV9 or the Hyundai Ioniq 9, which offer more range for a similar price. And if you absolutely need something that’s like a minivan, the Toyota Sienna is hard to beat. While it’s not a full EV, its hybrid setup still offers a healthy 36 MPG.

But, I’ve also noticed that used EVs tend to drop in price far quicker than gas cars. You can currently find the Polestar 2, which launched at around $60,000, for $30,000 or less in the used market. While I can’t guarantee the Buzz will drop that far, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see used versions for around $40,000 in a few years. And at that point, it could be a decent purchase even with its relatively low range.

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Wrap-up

It’s clear that the ID.Buzz is a big swing for VW, and it’s truly unique since there aren’t any EV minivans outside of China. It’s just a shame that it’s held back by some obvious issues. The ID.Buzz is still undeniably useful though, especially if you don’t plan on taking many road trips, so there’s a chance it’ll become more compelling as its price falls.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/volkswagen-idbuzz-review-a-head-turning-ev-microbus-with-unfortunate-flaws-143024824.html?src=rss 

Who Is Larry Hoover? His Release, Age & More After Trump Commuted Sentence

The Gangster Disciples co-founder recently had his sentence commuted by President Trump. Learn more about him, his past case, and whether he’s being released here.

The Gangster Disciples co-founder recently had his sentence commuted by President Trump. Learn more about him, his past case, and whether he’s being released here. 

NVIDIA’s native GeForce NOW app is now available for Steam Deck

The Steam Deck just got even more useful. NVIDIA’s native GeForce NOW app is now available for the portable console, after being teased back at CES. This allows Steam Deck owners to stream the entire library of over 2,200 games, with up to a 4K resolution at 60FPS.

There are some benefits to using this service even when the game already runs natively on the Steam Deck. The integration provides HDR, DLSS 4 and Reflex on supported titles and the settings can be pushed much higher than usual. This is a streaming platform, so the Steam Deck is more or less just a display for cloud content.

To that end, NVIDIA promises a massive increase in battery life when using GeForce NOW as compared to running a game natively on the console. The company says players could squeeze around 50 percent more use out of the Steam Deck before requiring a charge. This is a big deal, as the Deck is a noted battery hog.

It also allows players to run games that aren’t available on the handheld. GeForce NOW pulls its library from Steam, Epic Games Store, Game Pass for PC, Ubisoft, Blizzard’s Battle.net and other places. NVIDIA says that it can be used to run games like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered, Monster Hunter Wilds and Microsoft Flight Sim 2024 “at max settings without worrying about hardware limits.” That’s an enticing proposition.

The Steam Deck is also easily docked to a TV, offering a way to play the aforementioned titles on the big screen. There’s a free version of GeForce NOW to try it out, but it comes with serious caveats. The queues are generally much longer here than with paid subscriptions and users are limited to play sessions of one hour. The company’s offering a six-month Performance membership right now for $30. This reverts back to $50 once the period expires.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-is-now-available-for-steam-deck-130016615.html?src=rss 

Fujifilm GFX100RF review: A powerful and fun camera that’s far from perfect

After watching its fixed-lens X100 VI camera do stratospheric sales numbers, Fujifilm decided to build a bigger and badder version that could go up against Leica’s full-frame Q3. The result is the $4,899 GFX100RF, the first-ever 100-megapixel medium format compact camera.

The GFX100RF has some novel features, like a crop dial that lets you choose aspect ratios ranging from vertical 3:4 to a panoramic 65:24. It can digitally zoom via a dedicated toggle and offers all the social media-friendly benefits of the X100 VI, including film simulations. You can even shoot medium-format 4K video.

However, the GFX100RF has some flaws. Where Leica’s Q3 has a fast 28mm f/1.7 lens and optical stabilization, Fujifilm’s 35mm lens (28mm equivalent) here is limited to f4 and lacks any shake reduction, hurting the camera in low light. I’ve used the camera for nearly two weeks now and enjoyed it, but given the high price and quirks, it’s definitely not for everyone.

Design and handling

Though it’s Fujifilm’s smallest medium-format camera, the GFX100RF is still a hefty unit at 735 grams. That’s more than many full-frame mirrorless cameras and around the same weight as the Q3. The control layout is similar to the X100 VI with control dials on the front and back, along with exposure compensation, shutter speed and ISO controls on top.

What’s new is the aspect ratio dial that offers modes for 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 17:6, 3:4, 1:1, 7:6, 5:4 and 65:24 (the latter pays tribute to Fujifilm’s TX-1 panoramic camera). The GFX100RF also has a toggle up front to select 28mm, 35mm, 50mm and 63mm (full-frame equivalent) zoom levels. Those gradually lose resolution due to cropping, from 100MP at 28mm down to 20MP at 63mm. Bokeh is also reduced as the sensor size shrinks.

The rear 2.1-million-dot, 3.15-inch display only tilts up and down, but that’s fine for the camera’s primary street photo role. Though sharp and detailed, the 5.76-million-dot electronic viewfinder unfortunately lacks the X100 VI’s signature hybrid display that lets you switch between optical and electronic views. However, it does offer three modes to support the aspect ratio dial and make composition easier. One only shows the selected crop, another shows the full scene with a box around the crop and the third displays everything outside the crop at 50 percent opacity.

Fujifilm’s GFX100RF includes an innovative aspect ratio dial at back

Steve Dent for Engadget

Battery life on the GFX100RF is outstanding with up to 820 shots on a charge or about 100 minutes of 4K 30 fps video shooting. For me, that amounted to nearly two days of use, which is better than nearly every other (non-DSLR) camera I’ve tested. The camera also includes dual UHS-II memory card slots plus mic, headphone, microHDMI and USB-C ports. The latter allows not only data transfers and charging, but also SSD video recording.

Performance

The GFX100RF is essentially a GFX100S II squeezed into a compact body, so performance is similar with up to 6 fps burst shooting speeds. However, each RAW file is up to 150MB in size and JPEGs are 70MB, so even at those slower speeds, you can fill your memory cards very quickly. That said, this camera definitely isn’t designed for sports or wildlife, so I didn’t use burst shooting often.

The autofocus is reliable when shooting single photos, but it’s a little laggy for bursts. Using the face and eye detect AI modes helps nail eye focus reliably, but it’s not as fast as Sony and Canon’s systems. It also supports animal, bird and vehicle tracking, which helped me capture sharp photos of ducks floating on the Seine river in Paris.

Steve Dent for Engadget

The GFX100RF has both mechanical and silent electronic shutter modes. Rolling shutter skew is a big issue with this sensor in silent mode with fast moving subjects, though. Luckily, the mechanical shutter eliminates that and is nearly inaudible.

The built-in ND filter can reduce light up to four stops, letting you shoot on sunny days while retaining some bokeh. However, the main problem is when there’s not enough light. The minimum f4 aperture is simply inadequate and the lack of stabilization exacerbates the issue as you risk blurry photos at slow shutter speeds. In dim light you may need to pack a tripod, which isn’t ideal for a compact camera.

Image quality

The aspect ratio and zoom options on the GFX100RF are handy and fun. Some curmudgeons may prefer to shoot full sensor 100MP photos and then just crop later in post production. But the GFX100RF lets you have your cake and eat it, too. You can apply all the crops, zooms and film simulations you want and save them as JPEGs for easy sharing. Then, if you need to go back and change something, you also have the full 100MP RAW image as a backup (though obviously, shooting both will fill your memory card more quickly).

As with the GFX100S II, the GFX100RF is a top performer when it comes to detail and sharpness. Colors are pleasing and RAW files retain high amounts of dynamic range, allowing for easy adjustment in Lightroom. And of course, Fujifilm’s film simulations give you colorful, nostalgic options — like Reala Ace or the dramatic black and white look of Acros — straight out of the camera.

The GFX100RF also delivers beautiful bokeh, with the f4 aperture equivalent to around f3 for a full-frame camera in terms of depth of field (but not light gathering). Like other GFX models, the large sensor produces more dramatic images than full frame for portraits, landscapes or street shots.

Like I mentioned, things fall apart when the light dims, though. With no option below f4 and no stabilization, I relied on high ISOs to boost exposure. The GFX100RF isn’t bad in this area, with controllable noise up to about ISO 8000, but that’s not high enough considering the other factors. For these reasons, the GFX100RF is less versatile than it could be.

Video

Steve Dent for Engadget

The GFX100RF can handle 4K and widescreen DCI 4K at up to 30 fps with fairly high bit rates, as long as you have a fast UHS-II SD card. It can even shoot ProRes with at much higher data speeds, but for those, you’ll need to record directly to an SSD via the USB Type-C port.

Autofocus for video is decent but not incredibly fast, so ideally your subjects don’t move too much. The AI-powered face and eye detection helps nail focus when filming people, but again, can fail if subjects dart around.

Video has a dreamy quality and bokeh that only a large sensor can offer. Like the GFX100S II, the GFX100RF captures video using the full width of the sensor in most modes, albeit with pixel binning that reduces quality. The sharpest video comes with a 1.32x crop, but that reduces the image quality benefits of a large sensor.

Video on the GFX100RF has one thing going for it that the photo side lacks: digital stabilization. This smooths out shakiness for handheld shots, but the excessive rolling shutter limits your ability to move the camera quickly.

Colors are pleasing and easy to adjust, particularly when using Fujifilim’s F-Log or F-Log2 10-bit modes to boost dynamic range. And of course, Reala Ace, Acros and other film simulations are available in video modes to create great looks straight out of the camera.

Wrap-up

Steve Dent for Engadget

Fujifilm’s $4,899 GFX100RF is a powerful camera with incredible image quality that’s hampered by a lack of low-light performance. It’s also a niche and expensive product that, unlike Fujifilm’s popular X100 VI, only appeals to a small group of photographers.

Its primary rival in this space is Leica’s Q3, which has a smaller 60MP full-frame sensor and higher $6,735 price tag. However, the Q3 has a much faster 28mm f/1.7 lens, less rolling shutter, a single SD UHS-II card slot and up to 8K video. It also has the Leica brand cachet, which does mean something to people spending this kind of money.

The GFX100RF is fun to use, though, and introduces several innovations like the aspect ratio dial. Though it may never have a huge market, I think products like this push the industry in new directions and create conversations that draw new people into photography. So even though I’d never buy one, I’m glad the GFX100RF exists for those reasons.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/fujifilm-gfx100rf-review-a-powerful-and-fun-camera-thats-far-from-perfect-133034384.html?src=rss 

Meta AI already has 1 billion active users

Mark Zuckerberg told the company’s shareholders that Meta’s artificial intelligence now has 1 billion monthly active users across all its apps, according to CNBC. He also said during the annual shareholders meeting that the company will be focusing on “deepening the experience and making Meta AI the leading personal AI with an emphasis on personalization, voice conversations and entertainment” this year. Meta will keep growing the product until opportunities to earn money from it appear, such as inserting paid recommendations and offering a subscription service for users who want more computing power. 

Shortly after Meta launched a standalone app for its generative artificial intelligence this April, Zuckerberg already talked about how it could one day show ads and product recommendations. He also hinted at introducing subscriptions for a more “premium” version of the assistant. 

All of Meta’s apps, namely Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, have the assistant baked in. It’s also available on the Ray-Ban Meta glasses and the company’s Quest headsets. It’s very easy to accidentally interact with it if you’re using any of the company’s applications, and as NDTV has noted, Zuckerberg didn’t say whether those monthly active users specifically sought out the AI for use and engaged with it in meaningful ways. But Susan Li, the company’s chief financial officer, reportedly said that AI use has been growing fastest on WhatsApp, where users can chat with it, ask it questions and use it to generate images. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/meta-ai-already-has-1-billion-active-users-120023875.html?src=rss 

Tesla says it has been testing driverless Model Ys in Austin for ‘several days’

Tesla‘s robotaxi service has started testing in Austin without drivers in advance of its promised June launch, according to the company. “For the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no on in driver’s seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents,” CEO Elon Musk posted on X. “A month ahead of schedule.”

Earlier this year, Tesla promised to launch its robotaxi service sometime in June, using an internal fleet of 10 to 20 Model Ys operating in a limited, geo-fenced part of Austin with remote human assistance. The level of human assistance (teleoperation) isn’t clear, but there are fears based on Tesla’s recent history that human operators may be used to cover up any technical deficiencies in Tesla‘s self-driving vehicles.

 A recent Bloomberg report was more specific about the launch date with paid customers, putting it at June 12. However, reports earlier this month indicated that Tesla had yet to even start testing without drivers as of mid-May, so it would only have a few weeks of testing before a commercial launch.

On top of that, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is still in the dark about many details around the service. “The agency would like to gather additional information about Tesla‘s development of technologies for use in ‘robotaxi’ vehicles to understand how Tesla plans to evaluate its vehicles and driving automation technologies for use on public roads,” the NHTSA wrote in a May 8 letter to Tesla.

That information is key for public safety, because Tesla will only be using camera-based systems and not LiDAR and radar sensors like Waymo and other robotaxi operators. In a recent analyst call, Elon Musk said that the Model Y robotaxi vehicles would be the same as Model Y vehicles sold to the public. “There’s no change to it,” Musk said (before being contradicted by Tesla‘s Autopilot software director).

No other details were released, but the upcoming service is certainly of critical importance to the automaker given flagging Tesla EV sales, particularly in Europe. CEO Elon Musk famously staked the future of Tesla on robotaxis, reportedly even canceling a budget EV to focus on that service. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/tesla-says-it-has-been-testing-driverless-model-ys-in-austin-for-several-days-123037251.html?src=rss 

X is ‘pausing’ encrypted DMs

X users can no longer send encrypted messages on the platform. The company said in an update that it’s “pausing” the feature “while we work on making some improvements.” Users will still be able to view previously-sent encrypted chats, but won’t be able to send any new ones.

Up to now, encrypted DMs have been available only on messages between verified users who are mutual or who have previously accepted DMs from each other. Screenshots of the feature from X’s help center labeled it as “early access.” (Notably, there were a number of other important caveats to X’s encryption, even when it was working, including the fact that encryption was never available for group chats, multimedia messages or metadata .)

It’s unclear when the feature will be available again or if the “pause” has anything to do with “XChat,” the company’s yet-to-be-launched chat platform. X employees have been dropping hints about XChat, which will reportedly feature encrypted direct messages, for some time. Screenshots from leakers suggest XChat could have additional security features like PIN-protected chats.

Officially, though, X hasn’t revealed much about XChat or what’s going on with the current version of encrypted DMs. X’s in-app inbox was one of the features that experienced numerous issues last week after a site-wide outage — possibly due to a fire at an Oregon facility used by the company — caused days of technical problems for the service. Updates on the company’s developer platform page indicate some of those issues have yet to be resolved.

X didn’t respond to a request for comment.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/x-is-pausing-encrypted-dms-215750222.html?src=rss 

Generated by Feedzy
Exit mobile version