Kalakshar US

Apple AirTags can really come in handy when one of your belongings has gone missing, and with a deal on Amazon right now, you can pick up a four-pack of the trackers to keep more of your things protected. Normally $99, a 10 percent discount has dropped the price of a four-pack to $89 — and with a $10 coupon that’s being offered alongside the deal, that’s slashed even further to just $79. Just don’t forget to check the “Apply $10 coupon” box before adding it to your cart.

AirTags have become a staple for Apple device owners over the past few years. The Bluetooth trackers are a little bigger than a quarter and slim enough to slip into a wallet, making them a convenient way to keep tabs on your possessions. With the right accessories for your AirTags, they can also be attached to a keychain or stuck directly onto the tracked items to be sure they stay put. AirTags rely on Apple’s Find My network, which can provide precise location information as long as there are other Apple devices nearby.

When the AirTags aren’t in the range of any Apple devices to generate a new position, the app will show the item’s last known location. They don’t need to be charged, either, and should last about a year before the battery needs to be replaced. Users can add up to 32 items in the Find My app to track. With the Find my app, you can also ping the AirTag so it will play a sound and lead you right to the lost item if it’s within your vicinity.

AirTags come with an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance, meaning they are pretty durable against the elements under normal conditions. They’re built to survive splashes of water and submersion up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. AirTags are the best Bluetooth trackers for iPhone owners thanks to the ease of use and peace of mind they bring.

Follow @EngadgetDeals on Twitter and subscribe to the Engadget Deals newsletter for the latest tech deals and buying advice.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/a-four-pack-of-apple-airtags-is-back-on-sale-for-79-160608453.html?src=rss 

Facebook was flooded with fake advertisements featuring a deepfaked Rishi Sunak ahead of the UK’s general election that’s expected to take place this year, according to research conducted by communications company Fenimore Harper. The firm found 143 different ads impersonating the UK’s Prime Minister on the social network last month, and it believes the ad may have reached more than 400,000 people. It also said that funding for the ads originated from 23 countries, including Turkey, Malaysia, the Philippines and the United States, and that the collective amount of money spent to promote them from December 8, 2023 to January 8, 2024 was $16,500. 

As The Guardian notes, one of the fake ads showed a BBC newscast wherein Sunak said that the UK government has decided to invest in a stock market app launched by Elon Musk. That clip then reportedly linked to a fake BBC news page promoting an investment scam. The video, embedded in Fenimore Harper’s website, seems pretty realistic if the viewer doesn’t look too closely at people’s mouths when they speak. Someone who has no idea what deepfakes are could easily be fooled into thinking that the video is legit.

The company says this is the “first widespread paid promotion of a deepfaked video of a UK political figure.” That said, Meta has long been contending with election misinformation on its websites and apps. A spokesperson told The Guardian that the “vast majority” of the adverts were disabled before Fenimore Harper’s report was published and that “less than 0.5 percent of UK users saw any individual ad that did go live.”

Meta announced late last year that it was going to require advertisers to disclose whether the ads they submit have been digitally altered in the event that they’re political or social in nature. It’s going to start enforcing the rule this year, likely in hopes that it can help mitigate the expected spread of fake news connected to the upcoming presidential elections in the US. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/facebook-was-inundated-with-deepfaked-ads-impersonating-uks-prime-minister-143009584.html?src=rss 

Just a few days ago, OpenAI’s usage policies page explicitly states that the company prohibits the use of its technology for “military and warfare” purposes. That line has since been deleted. As first noticed by The Intercept, the company updated the page on January 10 “to be clearer and provide more service-specific guidance,” as the changelog states. It still prohibits the use of its large language models (LLMs) for anything that can cause harm, and it warns people against using its services to “develop or use weapons.” However, the company has removed language pertaining to “military and warfare.”

While we’ve yet to see its real-life implications, this change in wording comes just as military agencies around the world are showing an interest in using AI. “Given the use of AI systems in the targeting of civilians in Gaza, it’s a notable moment to make the decision to remove the words ‘military and warfare’ from OpenAI’s permissible use policy,” Sarah Myers West, a managing director of the AI Now Institute, told the publication. 

The explicit mention of “military and warfare” in the list of prohibited uses indicated that OpenAI couldn’t work with government agencies like the Department of Defense, which typically offers lucrative deals to contractors. At the moment, the company doesn’t have a product that could directly kill or cause physical harm to anybody. But as The Intercept said, its technology could be used for tasks like writing code and processing procurement orders for things that could be used to kill people. 

When asked about the change in its policy wording, OpenAI spokesperson Niko Felix told the publication that the company “aimed to create a set of universal principles that are both easy to remember and apply, especially as our tools are now globally used by everyday users who can now also build GPTs.” Felix explained that “a principle like ‘Don’t harm others’ is broad yet easily grasped and relevant in numerous contexts,” adding that OpenAI “specifically cited weapons and injury to others as clear examples.” However, the spokesperson reportedly declined to clarify whether prohibiting the use of its technology to “harm” others included all types of military use outside of weapons development. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/openais-policy-no-longer-explicitly-bans-the-use-of-its-technology-for-military-and-warfare-123018659.html?src=rss