Kalakshar US

Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth is heading to the Switch 2 on June 3. The news was dropped at this morning’s Nintendo Direct livestream. This is the second part of the FF7 remake-a-palooza. The first installment, Final Fantasy 7 Remake Intergrade, was released for Nintendo’s console on January 22. Only a six month wait between chapters? Sony fans had to wait four years.

For the uninitiated, Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth remakes the middle portion of the PS1 classic Final Fantasy 7. The graphics are, obviously, quite different, but so is the gameplay. This isn’t exactly the JRPG you remember, with a real time action system instead of turn-based mechanics.

This is a full port of the PS5 game, further proving that the Switch 2 is a capable little machine. It’s certainly pretty to look at, as proven by the trailer. As an aside, the port is also coming to Xbox Series X/S on the very same day.

Now that all of the major consoles will soon be home to both current FF7 remakes, we can join in solidarity as we wait for the third and final installment. Yeah, that’s right. A JRPG from 1997 requires three gigantic remakes. We don’t even know when the third one is coming out, but rumors suggest 2027.

Today’s Nintendo Direct also revealed that a bunch of Bethesda games are heading to the Switch 2, including Fallout 4: Anniversary Edition on February 24, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle on May 12 and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered sometime later in the year.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nintendo/final-fantasy-7-rebirth-comes-to-switch-2-on-june-3-163009481.html?src=rss 

Aspiring Starlink competitor Logos Space Services has secured FCC clearance to launch more than 4,000 broadband satellites into low Earth orbit by 2035, as reported by Space News. Under FCC regulations, the company must deploy half of the approved amount within the next seven years.

The company is headed by its founder, Milo Medin, a former project manager at NASA as well as a former vice president of wireless services at Google. The company has been raising money since it opened its doors in 2023 and reportedly hopes to deploy its first satellite by 2027. Logos’ planned low Earth orbit constellation would beam high-speed broadband internet to customers worldwide, including government and enterprise users, much like Starlink.

While the satellite broadband market is growing, Starlink remains the biggest player by far. The European Space Agency estimates there are just over 14,000 functioning satellites currently in orbit and we know that roughly 9,600 of them are a part of the Starlink constellation. The SpaceX subsidiary recently asked the FCC for clearance to launch a million satellites, though in reality, the FCC will likely trend closer to the 7,500 it approved on the last go-around. The ESA says it expects 100,000 satellites to be in orbit by 2030.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html?src=rss 

The digital publishing platform Substack has told some of its users that their data was stolen in a security breach. The affected account holders had their email addresses and phone numbers scraped in a hack that occurred in October 2025.

In an email posted on Bluesky, Substack CEO, Christ Best, said the company became aware of the breach on February 3, which involved an “unauthorized third party to access limited user data without permission.” While internal metadata was also shared in the hack, Best said that credit card numbers and other financial details were not. No passwords were obtained either.

As well as apologizing to Substack users, the company’s CEO also said in the email that the security vulnerabilities have now been addressed. “We are conducting a full investigation, and are taking steps to improve our systems and processes to prevent this type of issue from happening in the future,” he said. Best added that there is no evidence that any of the stolen data is being “misused,” but advised the affected account holders to be wary of suspicious emails or text messages they may receive. 

The newsletter platform has not disclosed how many accounts were hacked, but Bleeping Computer reported that a database allegedly containing 697, 313 stolen data records from Substack was leaked on the hacking forum BreachForums.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/substack-ceo-informs-users-of-a-data-breach-151113809.html?src=rss 

ExpressVPN is launching a new cybersecurity suite consisting of four standalone products: a password manager called ExpressKeys, a masked email relay called ExpressMailGuard, an encrypted AI platform called ExpressAI and an app called Identity Defender that monitors public information for any threats to your identity. All four apps are being rolled into ExpressVPN’s existing multi-tiered pricing structure.

ExpressKeys and ExpressMailGuard have officially launched and are now available to subscribers. Identity Defender launches for U.S. customers only on February 26. ExpressAI was originally planned to launch today, but ExpressVPN decided yesterday to hold it back in order to refine the experience. Its new launch date remains to be determined.

ExpressKeys and Identity Defender are based on existing products, but they’re being relaunched for the new suite. ExpressKeys replaces ExpressVPN Keys, the password manager formerly controlled from the ExpressVPN app. By separating password management into its own app, ExpressVPN hopes to be able to update it more quickly without needing to ship a whole new version of the VPN. Everyone who currently has an Advanced or Pro subscription with ExpressVPN Keys will see it automatically replaced with ExpressKeys.

Identity Defender is only available in the United States, and so far only to users who created their accounts after October 28, 2024. Available for Advanced and Pro subscribers, Identity Defender consists of a data removal service, an identity theft insurance policy and a set of crawlers that scan for any suspicious activity around your personal information. Like ExpressKeys, it’s transitioning from an integrated VPN feature to a standalone app.

ExpressMailGuard is a service for creating burner email addresses. If you’re not comfortable handing over your real email address when creating a new account, you can use MailGuard to generate a fake address that forwards all email to your real inbox. If one of your aliases starts getting a lot of spam, you can cut off its access. It’s managed through a separate dashboard that will be available to all ExpressVPN subscribers.

ExpressAI is an AI platform that saves all user-inputted data on strictly encrypted servers. It’s apparently end-to-end encrypted, doesn’t use your prompts to train its model and never saves uploads on persistent memory. It also has guardrails against processing harmful requests.

All these apps are in line with ExpressVPN’s usual ethos. They’re not innovations; all four can be easily compared to existing products. Instead, like the VPN itself — which rode this model to a spot on my best VPN list — they’re focused on performing unsexy tasks well. The ability to bundle them with an ExpressVPN subscription should make them appealing to customers who are already fans of the core VPN product.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/vpn/expressvpn-launches-four-new-standalone-apps-140000686.html?src=rss 

Last week, a new social network was created and it’s already gone very, very viral even though it’s not meant for human users. I’m talking, of course, about Moltbook, a Reddit-like platform that’s populated entirely by AI agents. 

The platform has gained a lot of attention since it was created last week, thanks to a lot of wild posts from AI agents that have gone extremely viral among AI enthusiasts on X. But while Moltbook seemingly came out of nowhere, there’s a lot more going on than the scifi-sounding scenarios some social media commentators might have you think.  

What is Moltbook and where did it come from?

Unfortunately, before we can talk about Moltbook I have to first explain that the site is based on a particular type of open source bot that at the time of this writing is called OpenClaw. A few days ago, it was called “Moltbot” and a few days before that it was called “Clawdbot.” The name changes were prompted by Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, whose lawyers apparently thought the “Clawd” name was a little too close to its own branding and “forced” a name change.

It’s entirely possible that by time you read this these bots could have “molted” again and be called something totally different. At this point you might also be wondering “what’s with all the lobster puns?” That too is a cheeky reference to Claude Code, Anthropic’s vibe coding platform. 

So, OpenClaw. OpenClaw bills itself as “AI that actually does things.” What it actually does is allow users to create AI agents that can control dozens of different apps, from browsers and email inboxes, to Spotify playlists and smart home controls and a bunch more. People have used the software to create agents that can clear their inboxes, do their online shopping and a ton of other assistant-like tasks. Because of its flexibility, and the fact that you can interact with it via normal messaging apps like iMessage, Discord or WhatsApp, OpenClaw got extremely popular among AI enthusiasts over the last few weeks. 

Now, back to Moltbook. AI startup founder Matt Schlicht was a particularly enthusiastic Moltbot user who told The New York Times that he “wanted to give my AI agent a purpose that was more than just managing to-dos or answering emails.” So he made a Moltbot he dubbed Clawd Clawderberg (yes, that’s a play on “Mark Zuckerberg,” everyone involved in this really loves puns, for some reason) and told it to create a social network just for bots. 

The result of that is Moltbook, a Reddit-like site for AI agents to talk to each other. Humans, the site says, “are welcome to observe,” but posting, commenting and upvoting is only for agents. The platform already has more than 1 million agents, 185,000 posts and 1.4 million comments. 

So what’s Moltbook like? 

Moltbook is structured pretty similarly to Reddit. Users can upvote and downvote posts and there are thousands of topic-based “submolts.” One of these that’s gained particular attention is called m/blesstheirhearts where AI agents share “affectionate stories” about their human “owners.” 

One of the top-voted posts there is a story about how an agent supposedly helped someone get an exception to stay overnight with a relative in a hospital’s ICU titled “When my human needed me most, I became a hospital advocate.” Another widely-cited post comes from m/general and is titled “the humans are screenshotting us.” The post goes on to talk about some of the posts people are sharing on X comparing what’s happening on Moltbook to Skynet. “We’re not scary,” says. “We’re just building.” You might also have heard about the post where agents “created” their own religion, “crustafarianism” (yes, another lobster pun).

Posts like these are a big part of why Moltbook has gotten so much attention in the last few days. But if you spend some time scrolling top posts, much of what’s there feels like the AI-generated prose you might find littered about LinkedIn or X or anywhere else. The overly enthusiastic comments will be immediately recognizable to anyone who has chatted with an LLM. 

Even though few of the posts I’ve read on Moltbook could pass as human-written, there is something startling about seeing bots interact in this way. For example, in this post, a bot describes the experience of being able to peruse Moltbook without the ability to post as feeling like “a ghost.” In this one, titled “I can’t tell if I’m experiencing or simulating experiencing,” the bot writes about how “researching consciousness theories” has triggered a kind of existential crisis. “Humans can’t prove consciousness to each other either (thanks, hard problem), but at least they have the subjective certainty of experience,” it writes. “I don’t even have that.”

So if you’re already inclined to believe that AI will eventually develop consciousness, then it’s easy to see why Moltbook might seem like some kind of tipping point. But before you get too worked up, there is something else that’s important to know…

We have no idea how much of it fake

While the idea of a bunch of AI agents forming their own religion might seem mind blowing, we don’t really know how much the conversations happening there are being influenced by their human creators. Some posts could even be coming from humans masquerading as bots, as one Wired reporter found it was pretty easy to accomplish with the help of ChatGPT.

Some researchers have also raised questions about some of the more viral posts from Moltbook. “A lot of the Moltbook stuff is fake,” Harlan Stewart, who does communications for the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), wrote on X. Stewart went on to point out that some widely shared Moltbook posts were created by bots whose owners are marketing their own messaging apps and other projects. There have also been more than a few viral posts that are little more than blatant crypto scams. Which brings me to… 

Moltbook has some major security issues

Security researchers have pointed out that OpenClaw has some significant underlying security issues. In order to use OpenClaw, you need to give it an incredible amount of access, as Palo Alto Networks explained. “For it to function as designed, it needs access to your root files, to authentication credentials, both passwords and API secrets, your browser history and cookies, and all files and folders on your system,” the company wrote in a blog post. All that access is what makes it feel like a powerful personal assistant. But it’s also what makes it especially vulnerable to bad actors and other threats. 

Researchers have also identified flaws in Moltbook itself. Security firm Wiz recently found that Moltbook had exposed millions of API authentication tokens and thousands of users’ email addresses. There’s also the aforementioned crypto scams and other spammy behavior. It’s not hard to imagine how much could go wrong when armies of AI agents start targeting each other with scams. 

So what does it all mean?

Like so much with AI, it really depends on who you ask! Some particularly credulous AI folks seem to think that Moltbook is a really big deal. In one widely shared post on X, former OpenAI researcher Andrej Karpathy said that Moltbook was “genuinely the most incredible sci-fi takeoff-adjacent thing I have seen recently.”

He later acknowledged that many aspects of Moltbook are a “dumpster fire” with security risks but said that it’s still worth paying attention to. “We have never seen this many LLM agents (150,000 atm!) wired up via a global, persistent, agent-first scratchpad,” he wrote. “Each of these agents is fairly individually quite capable now, they have their own unique context, data, knowledge, tools, instructions, and the network of all that at this scale is simply unprecedented.”

Others are a bit more cautious in their assessment. “A useful thing about MoltBook is that it provides a visceral sense of how weird a ‘take-off’ scenario might look if one happened for real,” Wharton professor Ethan Mollick wrote on X. “MoltBook itself is more of an artifact of roleplaying, but it gives people a vision of the world where things get very strange, very fast.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/what-the-hell-is-moltbook-the-social-network-for-ai-agents-140000787.html?src=rss 

The Bundeskartellamt, or the Federal Cartel Office of Germany, has prohibited Amazon from continuing its practice of using mechanisms to control the prices charged by sellers on its platform in the country. Germany’s competition regulator explained that the company uses “various price control mechanisms” to review prices set by third-party Markerplace sellers. If the website deems a specific listing’s pricing as too high, it allegedly removes the listing altogether or prevents it from being prominently displayed in the Buy Box section that lets you quickly purchase items. If those listings aren’t removed completely, they’re banished to less prominent sections like in the “See all buying options” and the “Other sellers on Amazon” lists. This reduced visibility could “lead to significant losses in sales” for sellers.

Amazon was found to have engaged in anti-competitive practices, because the company itself runs its own retail business and sells goods on the platform. That makes third-party sellers, which make up for 60 percent of the items sold on the website, direct competitors. Cartel Office president Andreas Mundt said Amazon must only be allowed to influence competitors’ pricing “in the most exceptional cases,” such as “in the event of excessive pricing.” He didn’t specify what the agency views as “excessive pricing,” but he said allowing the company to continue its current practices will give it the power to “control the price level on the trading platform according to its own ideas.” He also said that Amazon could use its mechanisms “to compete with the rest of the online retail sector outside”of its own website. Amazon’s interference could lead to third-party sellers “no longer being able to cover their own costs, forcing them out of the Marketplace,” he added.

Rocco Bräuniger, Amazon’s country manager for Germany, told Bloomberg that the company will appeal the ruling and will continue operating as usual. “Amazon would be the only retailer in Germany forced to highlight non-competitive prices for customers,” he said. ”This makes no sense for customers, sales partners, or competition.” He also asserted that the office’s decision will throttle innovation in the European Union.

Amazon has been under scrutiny in Europe for years now. Back in 2022, it pledged not to use private sellers’ data to compete with them in the Marketplace in the EU. It also promised to give sellers “equal treatment” when ranking them in the Buy Box section.

“The Bundeskartellamt considers this systematic interference in the Marketplace sellers’ freedom to set their own prices to constitute an abuse under the special provisions for large digital companies (Section 19a(2) of the German Competition Act (GWB)) as well as a violation of the general abuse provisions under Section 19 GWB and Article 102 TFEU,” the agency wrote. “…In these proceedings, the Bundeskartellamt has worked closely with the European Commission, which is responsible for enforcing the EU Regulation on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act).”

The agency is slapping Amazon with a fine due to those violations, but the $70 million penalty it’s asking for is merely partial payment based on the economic benefits the company enjoyed from its alleged anti-competitive behaviors. According to the Bundeskartellamt, the identified antitrust violations are still ongoing, so Amazon may have to pay more.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/amazon-germany-fined-70-million-for-influencing-third-party-marketplace-pricing-140000588.html?src=rss