Razer debuts two PC gamepads for esports

Though a keyboard and mouse are the usual tools of choice for PC esports, some competitive PC gamers employ gamepads for things like fighting games and Rocket League. Razer is now catering to those folks with two new PC gamepads, the wireless Wolverine V3 Pro 8K PC and wired Wolverine V3 Tournament Edition 8K PC. The key feature is right there in the names, with 8,000Hz polling speeds that promise high responsiveness for demanding pro or serious players. 

The Wolverine V3 Pro 8K PC offers 8,000Hz polling in both wired and wireless modes, meaning player inputs are recognized nearly instantly. By contrast, Razer’s Wolverine V3 Pro designed for Xbox and PC (which we liked) tops out at just 1,000Hz. The V3 Pro 8K PC model also uses Tunnel Magnetoresistance (TMR) thumbsticks with swappable caps for long life, consistent tension and superior anti-drift performance over time. 

That model is also Razer’s lightest wireless esports controller yet and features an ergonomic shape to reduce hand fatigue. Other features include 4 mouse click back buttons and 2 claw grip bumpers, Razer Pro HyperTriggers, Mecha-Tactile PBT Action Buttons, an 8-way floating D-Pad and Razer’s Synapse customization. It comes with a carrying case and 2m braided cable and is now available for $200. 

Razer also launched a wired-only model called the Wolverine V3 Tournament Edition PC. It offers most of the same features, like the 8,000Hz HyperPolling tech, TMR anti-drift thumbsticks, HyperTriggers, Mecha-Tactile PBT buttons and Synapse customization. It also comes with a 2m braided cable and is now available for $120 — a very reasonable price for a competition-level gamepad. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/razer-debuts-two-pc-gamepads-for-esports-120046977.html?src=rss 

You can pick ChatGPT’s older AI models again

ChatGPT will now allow you to choose between several GPT-5 variants and previous OpenAI models. In a post on X, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has revealed that the chatbot’s model picker now comes with three GPT-5 choices: Auto, Fast and Thinking. He said most “will want Auto,” which is most likely the standard version that’s already a reasoning model. But users will be able to choose the fast-responding version or the Thinking version that implies it delivers longer, more comprehensive answers if they want to. GPT-4o is now also back in the model picker for all paying users by default. 

OpenAI removed GPT-4o with the launch of GPT-5: The company significantly simplified ChatGPT because GPT-5 was supposed to offer a unified experience for users. However, its decision was met by criticism from people who preferred GPT-4o’s personality better, especially since it didn’t give them notice that it was deprecating older models. In his post, Altman promised users that if the company ever does deprecate GPT-4o, OpenAI “will give plenty of notice.” In addition to the GPT-5 and GPT-4o models, users can toggle to “Show additional models” in ChatGPT web settings if they want to access o3, 4.1, and GPT-5 Thinking mini. GPT-4.5 is only available to subscribers paying for the $200-a-month Pro tier, though, because it “costs a lot of GPUs.”

Altman said that GPT-5 Thinking now has rate limits of 3,000 messages a week, after which users will only be able to use GPT-5 Thinking mini. He has also revealed that OpenAI is working to update GPT-5’s personality to make it warmer, but “not as annoying (to most users) as GPT-4o.”

Updates to ChatGPT:

You can now choose between “Auto”, “Fast”, and “Thinking” for GPT-5. Most users will want Auto, but the additional control will be useful for some people.

Rate limits are now 3,000 messages/week with GPT-5 Thinking, and then extra capacity on GPT-5 Thinking…

— Sam Altman (@sama) August 13, 2025

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/you-can-pick-chatgpts-older-ai-models-again-121549264.html?src=rss 

OpenAI and Sam Altman are reportedly creating a startup rival to Elon Musk’s Neuralink

Sam Altman is preparing to co-found a new company funded by OpenAI that will go up against Elon Musk’s Neuralink, The Financial Post reported. The startup, called Merge Labs, will use AI for its brain-computer interface and compete directly with Neuralink, along with other nascent companies in the field like Precision Neuroscience and Synchron. 

The name Merge Labs comes from a term Altman used in 2017 called “the merge” that describes the moment human brains and computers come together. The company will raise funds, most from OpenAI’s ventures team, that will set its valuation at $850 million. Altman will co-found Merge Labs with Alex Blania (from World, an eyeball scanning company also backed by OpenAI) but won’t invest any capital himself, according to three people with direct knowledge of the project. 

Altman has been interested in the topic of machine-brain interfaces for years and suggested in the 2017 article above that the merge could arrive as soon as 2025 (it didn’t). More recently, he wrote in another blog post a “high-bandwidth brain-computer interface” could soon be developed with the aid of recent tech advances. 

Altman’s Merge Labs will be a direct competitor to Musk’s Neuralink, intensifying the rivalry between the two that kicked off when Musk left OpenAI’s board in 2018. Mind link technology has existed for decades now, but recent advances in implant tech and AI have allowed researchers to collect and process higher signal levels from the brain. 

Neuralink started its first human trials in January 2024 with quadriplegic subject Noland Arbaugh and later implanted its tech into a second anonymous subject. That subject, “Alex,” has reportedly been able to play FPS games and create 3D designs, while suffering from fewer issues and side effects as Arbaugh. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/openai-and-sam-altman-are-reportedly-creating-a-startup-rival-to-elon-musks-neuralink-123022874.html?src=rss 

Apple says the App Store is ‘fair and free of bias’ in response to Musk’s legal threats

Apple has denied Elon Musk’s accusation that it’s favoring OpenAI in its App Store rankings and making it impossible for other AI companies to reach the top. In a statement sent to Bloomberg, Apple said the App Store is “designed to be fair and free of bias.” The company’s spokesperson explained that the App Store features “thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.” They added: “Our goal is to offer safe discovery for users and valuable opportunities for developers, collaborating with many to increase app visibility in rapidly evolving categories.”

xAI founder Elon Musk accused Apple of “unequivocal antitrust violation” by favoring OpenAI in a post on X, warning that his company “will take immediate legal action.” In a separate post from his threat, he asked Apple why it “[refuses] to put either X or Grok in [its] ‘Must Have’ section.” X, he said, is “the #1 news app in the world,” while Grok is ranked number five among all apps. “Are you playing politics? What gives?” he continued. 

Musk didn’t provide evidence to back his accusations. It’s also worth noting that Chinese AI app DeepSeek reached the top of Apple’s free app rankings back in January, overtaking even ChatGPT. As X’s own Community Notes also mentioned in Musk’s post, added hours after it went up, Perplexity reached the top of overall rankings in India’s App Store back in July. Both apps were able to reach the top of their respective lists way after Apple and OpenAI announced their partnership last year. 

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman responded to Musk’s accusation, as well. He said it’s a “remarkable claim,” given that he has heard allegations that Musk manipulates “X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn’t like.” In response, Musk posted: “Scam Altman lies as easily as he breathes.”

Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation.

xAI will take immediate legal action.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 12, 2025

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/apple-says-the-app-store-is-fair-and-free-of-bias-in-response-to-musks-legal-threats-235555807.html?src=rss 

Match Group will pay $14 million to settle claims of deceptive business practices

The Federal Trade Commission announced that Match Group will pay $14 million to settle a complaint about deceptive practices. The settlement fee will be used to provide redress to injured customers of Match Group’s dating services, which include Match.com, Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid, and PlentyOfFish.

The agency sued Match Group in 2019 on a series of allegations. According to the complaint, the dating service company had used misleading ads to encourage subscriptions and then made it difficult for customers to cancel those subscriptions. Match Group was also accused of locking customers out of their accounts when they attempted to dispute billing charges.

In addition to the payment, Match Group has agreed to clearly and conspicuously disclose the terms of its “six-month guarantee,” as well as any conditions or limitations to those offers. It will also offer simple mechanisms for customers to cancel their subscriptions. Finally, Match Group will not retaliate or take action against customers who file billing disputes, and it won’t deny those customers access to paid-for services or goods.

Match Group also drew scrutiny earlier this year after an investigation claimed that it had failed to act on reports of sexual assault and made little effort to keep abusive or dangerous users from rejoining other dating platforms it owns.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/match-group-will-pay-14-million-to-settle-claims-of-deceptive-business-practices-224505163.html?src=rss 

Blizzard’s Story and Franchise Development team has voted to unionize

Workers from Blizzard Entertainment’s department for Story and Franchise Development have voted to unionize. Members of the team will become members of the Communication Workers of America and Microsoft has recognized the union. The SFD team is responsible for cinematics, animation and narrative in Blizzard’s series, creating content such as in-game cutscenes and promotional videos. The department also includes archival workers and historians for Blizzard franchises, such as World of Warcraft and Overwatch. A spokesperson from CWA said that there will be about 169 workers from the company joining the local chapter.

“After more than a decade working at Blizzard, I’ve seen all the highs and lows. For years, Blizzard has been a place where people could build their careers and stay for decades, but that stability’s been fading,” Bucky Fisk, a principal editor and member of the organizing committee, said. “With a union, we’re able to preserve what makes this place special, secure real transparency in how decisions are made, and make sure policies are applied fairly to everyone.”

“These past couple of months have felt both important and cathartic given what’s happened to video game workers across the industry,” said Sammi Kay, another member of the organizing committee and an associate producer at Blizzard. “At multiple points in my life, I’ve always been told to accept the way things are, but with organizing, we’re able to build a future better than we found it.”

Blizzard is owned by Microsoft. Today’s development marks the latest move for game developers under the tech giant’s umbrella to pursue union representation. About 600 quality assurance workers from Activision joined CWA last March. The QA team from ZeniMax also ratified its union agreement in June and Raven Software finally secured a union contract earlier this month.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/blizzards-story-and-franchise-development-team-has-voted-to-unionize-213818158.html?src=rss 

Russia reportedly implicated in hack on US federal courts’ databases

Databases used by US federal courts for sharing and managing case documents have been hacked. Politico first reported on the hack last week on August 6; today, an investigation from The New York Times states that Russia is suspected to be involved in the attack. The Administrative Office of the US Courts initially identified the severity of the cyberattack in July, although the extent of the breach by “persistent and sophisticated cyber threat actors” has not been disclosed and may still not be known by national officials.

Both the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) and PACER systems have been impacted by the attack. CM/ECF is used by legal professionals and courts to store documents, while PACER grants the public limited access to those same files. Anonymous officials told Politico that chief judges for federal courts in the 8th Circuit were briefed on the attack, but were unable to confirm what agency provided the briefing. The 8th Circuit includes Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.

Politico‘s original report said the hack may have “compromised the identities of confidential informants involved in criminal cases at multiple federal district courts.” The Times coverage added that some of the searches by the intruders “included midlevel criminal cases in the New York City area and several other jurisdictions, with some cases involving people with Russian and Eastern European surnames.” However, there have been no additional details revealed about what entity is behind the attack, whether a branch of Russian intelligence may have been involved, or what evidence the investigators have discovered tying the hack to Russia.

The isn’t the only time CM/ECF has been a hacking target. The courts introduced new protections for the system in 2021 in response to a cyberattack; a similar announcement arrived on August 7. At this time, the courts have been ordered to move files for cases that may have been of interest off the compromised systems, although some districts have ordered even more limited use of CM/ECF or PACER as a preventive measure.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/russia-reportedly-implicated-in-hack-on-us-federal-courts-databases-204029993.html?src=rss 

Gavin Casalegno’s Wife: Meet the ‘Summer I Turned Pretty’ Star’s Wife

Sorry to any ‘TSITP fans who were holding onto hope for Gavin because he’s happily married to his wife, Cheyanne. Learn all about her and their relationship here.

Sorry to any ‘TSITP fans who were holding onto hope for Gavin because he’s happily married to his wife, Cheyanne. Learn all about her and their relationship here. 

‘Maxton Hall’ Season 2: Release Date, Cast, Synopsis, Trailer & All Updates

Season 1 ended on a major cliffhanger between James and Ruby. Get all the updates on season 2 of ‘Maxton Hall — The World Between Us’ here.

Season 1 ended on a major cliffhanger between James and Ruby. Get all the updates on season 2 of ‘Maxton Hall — The World Between Us’ here. 

Threads is up to 400 million monthly active users

Meta’s X competitor, Threads, is continuing to add users at a brisk clip, with the social network now surpassing 400 million monthly active users. The news, reported by Fast Company, follows Threads reaching the 300 million mark in December 2024 and the 200 million mark in August 2024.

FC also cited data from Similarweb that showed mobile performance for Threads drawing closer to the figures from X. In June, Threads posted 115.1 million daily active users on mobile and X had 132 million. Those figures marked an increase of 128 percent on-year for Threads, but a slide of 15 percent from the previous year for X.

When Meta launched Threads in 2023, Mark Zuckerberg set a goal of making it “a public conversations app with 1 billion+ people on it.” There was still plenty of progress left for the platform to make after its first year, on users and features. But already in 2025, Threads has added some pretty core features such as DMs and an increased emphasis on external links (although whether people will click those links is a separate question).

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/threads-is-up-to-400-million-monthly-active-users-190203754.html?src=rss 

Generated by Feedzy
Exit mobile version