Kalakshar US

OpenAI has removed a feature that made shared ChatGPT conversations appear in search results. The “short-lived experiment” was based on the chatbot’s link creation option. After complaints, OpenAI’s chief information security officer, Dane Stuckey, said the company is working to remove the chats from search engines.

The public outrage stems from a Fast Company article from earlier this week (via Ars Technica). Fast Company said it found thousands of ChatGPT conversations in Google search results. The indexed chats didn’t explicitly include identifying information. But in some cases, their contents reportedly contained specific details that could point to the source.

To be clear, this wasn’t a hack or leak. It was tied to a box users could tick when creating a shareable URL directing to a chat. In the pop-up for creating a public link, the option to “Make this chat discoverable” appeared. The more direct explanation (“allows it to be shown in web searches”) appeared in a smaller, grayer font below. Users had to tick that box to make the chat indexed.

You may wonder why people creating a public link to a chat would have a problem with its contents being public. But Fast Company noted that people could have made the URLs to share in messaging apps or as an easy way to revisit the chats later. Regardless, the public discoverability option is gone now.

In Fast Company‘s report, Stuckey defended the feature’s labeling as “sufficiently clear.” But after the outcry grew, OpenAI relented. “Ultimately, we think this feature introduced too many opportunities for folks to accidentally share things they didn’t intend to, so we’re removing the option,” Stuckey announced on Thursday.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/openai-is-removing-chatgpt-conversations-from-google-194735704.html?src=rss 

Microsoft is ending support for its ChromeOS competitor Windows 11 SE. The company will officially stop providing “software updates, technical assistance and security fixes” in October 2026, according to an updated support document spotted by NeoWin. 

When it was announced in 2021, Windows 11 SE was pitched as a simplified, lightweight version of Microsoft’s operating system for the classroom. Chromebooks and ChromeOS devices are widely used in schools around the world, so it made sense that Microsoft would want to offer something competitive. Windows 11 SE, and the Surface Laptop SE that launched alongside it, were the company’s latest attempt to do just that.

Clearly the plan didn’t work, as evidenced by Microsoft’s decision to shutdown Windows 11 SE just five years later. The operating system was available on other low-cost devices, but it doesn’t appear that it acquired nearly the same-sized audience as ChromeOS. If it had, Microsoft likely wouldn’t be dumping it so unceremoniously.

Windows 11 SE isn’t the first time Microsoft has tried to spin-off a more efficient version of Windows, though it did seem like the most thought out. For example, the company has also tried Windows 10 S (which lives on as “S Mode” in Windows 11) and the never-launched Windows 10X, a streamlined version of Windows for dual-screen devices. 

While Windows 11 SE devices will work after Microsoft’s October 2026 cut-off, the company recommends “transitioning to a device that supports another edition of Windows 11 to ensure continued support and security.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/microsoft-is-killing-its-failed-chromeos-competitor-windows-11-se-200050553.html?src=rss 

A jury in Florida has found Tesla partially liable for a 2019 crash involving the company’s Autopilot self-driving feature, The Washington Post reports. As a result, the company will have to pay $200 million in damages.

Autopilot comes pre-installed on Tesla’s cars and handles things like collision detection and emergency braking. Tesla has mostly avoided taking responsibility for crashes involving cars with the Autopilot enabled, but the Florida case played out differently. The jury ultimately decided that the self-driving tech enabled driver George McGee to take his eyes off the road and hit a couple, Naibel Benavides Leon and Dillon Angulo, ultimately killing one and severely injuring the other. 

During the case, Tesla’s lawyers argued that McGee’s decision to take his eyes off the road to reach for his phone was the cause of the crash, and that Autopilot shouldn’t be considered. The plaintiffs, Angulo and Benevides Leon’s family, argued that the way Tesla and Elon Musk talked about the feature ultimately created the illusion that Autopilot was safer than it really was. “My concept was that it would assist me should I have a failure … or should I make a mistake,” McGee said on the stand. “And in that case I feel like it failed me.” The jury ultimately assigned two-thirds of the responsibility to McGee and a third to Tesla, according to NBC News.

In a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation of Autopilot from 2024, crashes were blamed on driver misuse of Tesla’s system and not the system itself. The NHTSA also found that Autopilot was overly permissive and “did not adequately ensure that drivers maintained their attention on the driving task,” which lines up with the 2019 Florida crash.

While Autopilot is only one component of Tesla’s larger collection of self-driving driving features, selling the idea that the company’s cars could safely driving on their own is a key part of its future. Elon Musk has claimed that Full Self-Driving (FSD), the paid upgrade to Autopilot, is “safer than human driving.” Tesla’s Robotaxi service relies on FSD being able to function with no or minimal supervision, something that produced mixed results in the first few days the service was available. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/tesla-found-partially-liable-for-a-deadly-2019-crash-193612682.html?src=rss 

Reddit is reversing course on its plans to put some subreddits behind a paywall, at least for now. CEO Steve Huffman said the company is “shifting resources away” from the effort as it doubles down on search.

During the company’s recent earnings call, Huffman said that Reddit was “deprioritizing” its work on “user economy” initiatives in order to put more resources into turning the site into a “go-to search engine.” In a follow-up AMA on Reddit, he confirmed this includes pausing work on paid subreddits.

“To stay focused on what matters most, we’re shifting resources away from a few areas, such as work on the user economy,” he wrote. “This includes what some have referred to as paid subreddits.” Though Huffman added that “it’s still an opportunity we believe in,” it’s a notable departure from comments he made in February, when he said such features would be rolling out in 2025.

Reddit’s priorities have apparently changed considerably since then. While paid communities were meant to appeal to Reddit power users, the company still very much needs to grow its user base, according to Huffman. “The folks previously working on user economy will join our efforts to improve the core app, including onboarding and personalization,” the CEO explained in another AMA response. “That gets at our most important need today, which is logged-in core user growth.”

While Huffman has spent the last year hinting at paid features, it’s not hard to understand why Reddit would now be shifting away from that model. Advertising is still very much the most important part of the company’s business, as Huffman explained. And adding more core users to the platform will be key to growing that business. To put this in perspective, during the last quarter, Reddit pulled in $465 million in ad revenue and just $35 million from “other” sources, like data licensing and Reddit premium. Even if paywalled subreddits could substantially increase that “other” number, it would still be a small fraction of what the company is making from advertisers.

So while paid subreddits may still be on the company’s roadmap, users shouldn’t expect to see them any time soon. They can, however, probably expect to see more ads in more places on Reddit over time. For example, Huffman said that the company sees “ads on search return pages … as a future opportunity.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/reddit-puts-its-plans-for-paid-subreddits-on-hold-181455933.html?src=rss 

Google’s shortened URLs are the horror movie monster of the Google Graveyard: They keep finding a way to stay alive. On Friday, the company said goo.gl links that don’t show the above warning will work for the foreseeable future. 

In 2018, Google cut off the ability to create new shortened links. But it kept existing URLs active as a courtesy to those who relied on them. Then, a year ago, the company said its bit.ly rival would shut down completely on August 25, 2025. That appeared to be the final nail in the coffin. Not so fast.

That brings us to Google’s change of heart today. “We understand these links are embedded in countless documents, videos, posts and more, and we appreciate the input received,” the company explained.

You’ll know yours is shutting down if it currently shows a warning message. (“This link will no longer work in the near future.”) If it redirects to the destination without that detour, it will live to fight another day. Google says the survivors were chosen based on whether they showed activity in late 2024.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/some-googl-urls-will-live-to-fight-another-day-183508123.html?src=rss