Kalakshar US

Google has started rolling out customizable calling cards for the beta versions of its Android Contacts and Phone apps. Android Authority found clues that the company was working on the feature back in July when it did an APK teardown. Now, you can give it a try if you decide to install the beta versions of the apps. As the publication notes, Google’s implementation is the direct opposite of Apple’s. On iOS, your set your own photo and name that you want to show up on other people’s phones when you call them. You cannot alter other people’s Contact Posters, as Apple calls the feature. Meanwhile, on Android, you can’t make your own calling card. The feature instead gives you a way to set a photo and a name for your contacts that show up on your screen when they call you. 

If you do have access to the beta Contacts app for Android, you’ll now see a note that says “Try adding a calling card” when you view a contact’s details. From there, you can choose a photo you have of that contact from your gallery or take a new one of them with your camera. You can also adjust the font type and color for their name. Whenever they call, that calling card will take over your phone screen. If this sounds nothing new to you, it may be because Samsung has had a profile card feature for a while now that works just like Google’s implementation. It’s already widely available and accessible from your contacts’ profile pages. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/google-is-testing-customizable-calling-cards-for-android-that-show-up-when-your-friends-call-123038875.html?src=rss 

Ford has big plans for 2027: This week, the American carmaker announced a new “Universal EV Platform” for future electric cars, spearheaded by a $30,000 mid-sized EV pickup. In this episode, we’re joined by SAE International Editor Roberto Baldwin to break down all of Ford’s claims, as well as where its $5 billion manufacturing investment is going. Can Ford really rebound after slow EV sales and last year’s disappointing product delays?

Topics

Ford has a plan for a ‘Universal EV Platform’ and a $30,000 mid-size electric pickup, can they pull it off? – 0:49

OpenAI releases GPT-5, the reception so far is mixed – 24:45

NVIDIA and AMD may tithe 15% of their Chinese GPU sales to the U.S. government – 30:18

Goodbye: AOL will phase out dial-up at the end of September – 33:25

AI-powered “Smarter Siri” likely won’t hit iPhones until Spring 2026 – 36:42

Perplexity makes an unsolicited offer to buy Chrome for $34 billion, which is more than the company is worth – 41:03

Listener Mail: Gaming on a MacBook Air – 52:31

Working On – 57:05

Pop culture picks – 59:13

Subscribe!

iTunes

Spotify

Pocket Casts

Stitcher

Google Podcasts

Credits 

Host: Devindra Hardawar
Guest: Roberto Baldwin
Producer: Ben Ellman
Music: Dale North and Terrence O’Brien

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/engadget-podcast-how-real-is-fords-30000-ev-pickup-truck-113037240.html?src=rss 

The Supreme Court has decided not to weigh in on one of the many state-level age-verification laws currently being reviewed across the country. Today, the top court chose not to intervene on legislation from Mississippi about checking the ages of social media users, denying an application to vacate stay from NetChoice.

The Mississippi law requires all users to verify their ages in order to use social media sites. It also places responsibility on the social networks to prevent children from accessing “harmful materials” and it requires parental consent for minors to use any social media. NetChoice represents several tech companies — including social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube — and it sued to block the law on grounds that it violates the First Amendment. A district court ruled in favor of NetChoice, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted its temporary block.

Although Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied the application to vacate stay on the appeals court ruling, he also wrote that “NetChoice has, in my view, demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits—namely, that enforcement of the Mississippi law would likely violate its members’ First Amendment rights under this Court’s precedents.” He denied the application because NetChoice “has not sufficiently demonstrated that the balance of harms and equities favors it at this time.” This decision means that, at least for now, Mississippi’s law will be allowed to stand.

“Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment,” said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center. “This is merely an unfortunate procedural delay.”

There are several other state laws being assessed at various points in the US legal system. Some are centered on adult content providers such as pornography sites, while others are more broadly targeting social media use. Arkansas and Florida have seen federal judges block their laws, while Texas and Nebraska are working toward adopting their own rules about social media for minors.

Yahoo, the parent company of Engadget, is a member of NetChoice.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/the-supreme-court-lets-mississippis-social-media-age-verification-law-go-into-effect-231405142.html?src=rss 

If you’ve been unable to pay with PayPal on Steam, Valve says the limitation has to do with issues one of PayPal’s banking partners has with content on the platform, according to Rock Paper Shotgun. Users have noticed PayPal was disabled in some regions as far back as July, and the issue seems like it might be out of both Valve and PayPal’s hands.

“In early July 2025, PayPal notified Valve that their acquiring bank for payment transactions in certain currencies was immediately terminating the processing of any transactions related to Steam,” Valve writes in a Steam Support page. “This affects Steam purchases using PayPal in currencies other than EUR, CAD, GBP, JPY, AUD and USD.”

In a statement to Rock Paper Shotgun, Valve further clarified that the bank’s decision to withdraw support for Steam transactions through PayPal was made “regarding content on Steam, related to what we’ve previously commented on surrounding Mastercard.” Opting to terminate Steam transactions means that PayPal had to be disabled as a payment method for multiple currencies.

Engadget has contacted Valve and PayPal for more information on which regions this change impacts, and what other payment options will be available to them. We’ll update this article if we hear back.

Valve says it want to offer PayPal payments in those unsupported currencies in the future, “but the timeline is uncertain.” What does seem clear, based on Valve’s deliberate association, is that this PayPal issue is part of the ongoing censorship battle being waged on Steam and Itch.io.

Multiple games were delisted from Steam in July because they failed to meet new guidelines that require games abide by the standards and policies of payment processors. Because certain NSFW games didn’t, they were removed. Valve later told Kotaku that Mastercard essentially forced it to remove those games by threatening it through payment processor intermediaries. And Mastercard was reportedly pressured to do so in the first place by conservative activists who took issue with certain sexually explicit games on Steam.

In this case, a bank that works with PayPal is the weak link, rather than Steam or a payment network, but it’s entirely possible that acquiring bank is responding to a similar kind of pressure.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/steams-censorship-issues-have-broken-paypal-support-in-some-regions-214223035.html?src=rss 

Intel has had some recent struggles in delivering results for its shareholders, but the company could soon be answering to an additional boss. The current administration is reportedly in talks to have the US government acquire a stake in the chipmaker. No specifics about the size or value of the potential share in the company have been disclosed, but the focus appears to be on increasing Intel’s manufacturing footprint in the US. Bloomberg first reported the news, but at least one source cautioned the publication that the situation is still in flux.

Intel initially shared plans to construct a semiconductor facility in Ohio in 2022 while Pat Gelsinger was still at the helm of the company. Since then, the project has faced delays, and at its latest quarterly earnings report, execs said Intel would “slow the pace” on the Ohio construction, as well as scrapping other international building plans and making workforce cuts.

The potential for government ownership of Intel is the latest swing of the administration’s attitude toward the company. A few days after calling for his resignation over connections to China, President Donald Trump met with CEO Lip-Bu Tan and seemed to now hold a more positive outlook on the company leader.

A representative from Intel told Bloomberg in a statement that the company is “deeply committed to supporting President Trump’s efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/trumps-administration-may-look-to-buy-a-stake-in-intel-213234862.html?src=rss