Kalakshar US

It’s that time of year again, when all of our favorite streaming platforms start dropping personalized lists of what we’ve been consuming. Spotify Wrapped is perhaps the biggest of the bunch and it’s available for perusal right now.

As always, users can access Wrapped to find their most listened-to genres, artists, songs, albums and podcasts from the past year. This information is shareable via social media if you want random bald eagle avatars to comment on your music taste, but there’s a new interactive feature called Wrapped Party.

This is a game of a sort. Spotify says it “turns your listening data into a live competition.” Wrapped Party hands out awards for stuff like listening to smaller artists and obsession with a particular artist, in addition to total minutes streamed. Finally, friends can settle the age-old debate of “who listens to music more.”

Spotify Wrapped is also about the platform itself, so we have plenty of little tidbits from the global user base. Bad Bunny was named the most streamed artist in the world, just ahead of his Super Bowl performance that internet bozos have turned into a controversy for some reason. This is the fourth time he’s come out on top in the past five years. He also had the most popular album of the year.

The global top song is something of a surprise, as it’s not Bad Bunny or even Taylor Swift. It’s the Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars duet “Die With a Smile.” The top podcast is, as always, The Joe Rogan Experience. At least Spotify is getting what it paid for with Rogan.

If you don’t use Spotify for whatever reason, other major streaming platforms offer something similar to Wrapped. Apple Music has Replay and Amazon Music has Delivered. Even YouTube got in on the act this year, unveiling a recap for video watchers.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/music/spotify-wrapped-2025-is-here-and-now-its-a-competition-130052418.html?src=rss 

One of the iPhone’s many accessibility features is something Apple calls “Magnifier,” which uses the smartphone’s cameras to magnify and identify objects in the world around you. For Global Accessibility Awareness Day in May this year, Apple brought Magnifier to the Mac, opening up even more places the assistive tool can be used, like classroom or work environments where you might already have a MacBook pulled out.

Magnifier requires macOS 26 Tahoe and can work with a built-in webcam, a connected third-party camera or an iPhone via Apple’s Continuity feature. Provided your MacBook can run Apple’s latest software update, it’s a natural fit for zooming in on a whiteboard at the back of a large lecture hall or getting a closer look at documents on a desk in front of you. You can use the app to both capture an individual image you want to refer to later, or to analyze text in a live video feed. But where to begin? Here’s how to set up and use Magnifier on your Mac.

How to use Magnifier to identify and display text

A MacBook using Magnifier and a connected iPhone to identify and format text from a book.

Magnifier’s most powerful feature uses the MacBook’s machine learning capabilities to identify, display and format text that your camera captures. This works with text your camera can see in the room around you, and things it captures via macOS’ Desk View feature. For example, to view documents on your desk:

Open Magnifier.

Click on the Camera section in Magnifier’s menu bar and then select your Desk View camera from the dropdown menu.

Click on the Reader icon (a simple illustration of a document) near the top-right of your Magnifier window.

Click on the sidebar menu icon to access settings to format text.

Apple gives you options to change the color, font and background of text Magnifier identifies, among other customization options. If you’d prefer to capture faraway text, you can position a webcam or iPhone camera facing away from you and swap to it via the Camera section in Magnifier’s menu bar.

You can also listen to any text Magnifier has identified by clicking on the Play button in the top-right corner of Magnifier’s reader mode. Clicking the Pause button will pause playback, clicking the Skip Forward or Skip Backward buttons skip through lines of text, and if you want to adjust playback speed, you can click on the 1x button and pick a speed from the dropdown menu.

How to use Magnifier to zoom in on yourself

Magnifier can identify text, but it also works as a way to get a zoomed in view of your own face.

By default, Magnifier uses your MacBook’s built-in webcam, which means you’ll see a view of yourself and whatever’s behind you if you don’t have another camera selected. This might not be usual for seeing faraway text, but it is handy if you’re applying makeup, putting in contacts or doing anything else where you need a detailed view of your face.

In my tests, using Magnifier worked the best with my MacBook’s built-in webcam or an iPhone. When I tried using a third-party webcam from Logitech, my live camera feed was noticeably laggy. Your mileage may vary, but if you experience any issues with your own webcam, it’s worth trying your built-in webcam to see if that helps. You can swap between cameras and zoom in to your camera feed inside the Magnifier app:

Open Magnifier.

In the top menu bar, select Camera and then click on the camera you’d like to use in the dropdown menu.

Use the slider in the top center of the Magnifier window to zoom in on yourself.

You can see a live feed of your zoomed in view in Magnifier’s main window. If you click on the Camera button in the bottom-left corner of the app, you can also snap a photo to review later. Any photos you capture will appear in Magnifier’s left sidebar menu. Clicking on them lets you view them, zoom in on them and adjust their visual appearance (Brightness, Contrast and other visual settings) via the Image section in Magnifier’s menu bar.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/how-to-use-magnifier-on-a-macbook-to-zoom-in-on-faraway-text-080100677.html?src=rss 

You can tell a lot about a company by what they’re willing to sue over. Take Instacart, which just filed a lawsuit against New York City. Its beef? The company doesn’t like five new city laws, set to take effect in January. They would require Instacart to pay workers more and give customers a tipping option of at least 10 percent.

Reuters reports that Instacart’s suit targets Local Law 124, which mandates that grocery delivery workers receive the same minimum pay as restaurant delivery workers. It also challenged Local Law 107, which mandates 10 percent or higher tipping options (or a place to enter one manually). The lawsuit also takes aim at other laws requiring extra recordkeeping and disclosures. The new rules are set to take effect on January 26.

As is typical of companies griping about regulations that hurt their bottom lines, Instacart framed the issue as a noble fight for what’s right. “When a law threatens to harm shoppers, consumers, and local grocers — and especially when it does so unlawfully — we have a responsibility to act,” the company proclaimed in a blog post. “This legal challenge is about standing up for fairness, for the independence that tens of thousands of New York grocery delivery workers rely on and for affordable access to groceries for the people who need it most.”

Instacart’s suit reportedly claims that Congress banned state and local governments from regulating prices on platforms such as its own. It also alleges that New York’s state legislature “has long taken charge” of minimum pay, and that the US Constitution doesn’t allow states and cities to discriminate against out-of-state companies.

The company warns that everyone will lose if it’s forced to comply. Should the laws take effect, “Instacart will be forced to restructure its platform, restrict shoppers’ access to work, disrupt relationships with consumers and retailers and suffer constitutional injuries with no adequate legal remedy,” it claimed in the filing.

Instacart CEO Chris Rogers, elevated to the post in May, has an estimated net worth of at least $28.6 million. His predecessor, Fidji Simo, who chairs the board and is now with OpenAI, is reportedly worth around $72.7 million. If NYC’s minimum pay laws will be as catastrophic as Instacart claims, maybe they could chip in to help.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/instacart-sues-new-york-city-over-minimum-pay-tipping-laws-220205207.html?src=rss