Kalakshar US

Fresh off its Jimmy Kimmel suspension saga, Disney is giving its app a makeover. The Disney+ app will soon add a navigation bar and UX overhaul. The update also brings Hulu into the fold outside the US. After reportedly bleeding subscribers during the Kimmel saga, the company would surely welcome a renewed focus on its fictional epics.

The Disney+ homepage now has a new navigation bar at the top. “For You” is now the default landing tab. That’s where you’ll find personalized recommendations based on your viewing history. (Disney also updated its algorithm in hopes of serving up better suggestions.) The new nav bar also has dedicated tabs for Disney+, Hulu and ESPN content.

The vertical navigation bar (the existing one on the left side of the screen) now includes a live hub. Here, you’ll find live news, sports, events, and 24/7 streams.

As it prepares to fully integrate Hulu into Disney+, the company is making big changes for non-US users. On October 8, Hulu will replace Star as the app’s global entertainment brand. That’s where you find shows from ABC, FX and more. It also includes more mature content than its typical fare. American users won’t see any changes there. However, for everyone else, Star becomes Hulu next Wednesday.

The Disney+ app is also getting some love. iOS widgets are launching, providing a one-click entry point into the app’s content. The company says its mobile app will eventually host “mobile-first and mobile-exclusive experiences” to expand its reach. However, those are coming “in the year ahead.”

All of this follows the Jimmy Kimmel suspension that dominated headlines in late September. Disney-owned ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely on September 17, following pressure from officials in the Trump administration. That included FCC Chair Brendan Carr, who told the company, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” Disney, which recently wrapped up the anti-fascist epic Andor, chose the easy way.

The company changed its tune and reinstated Kimmel on September 22. Its official line was that it was the result of “thoughtful conversations with Jimmy.” However, the company reportedly lost 1.7 million Disney+ subscribers during that period, following widespread calls for a boycott.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/disney-design-and-navigation-changes-are-on-the-way-165513106.html?src=rss 

Now that Threads has grown to more than 400 million users, Meta is adding more features that could help the platform establish an identity. The company is testing a new “communities” feature that creates dedicated spaces for people to chat about specific topics and interests.

Meta describes the feature as an evolution of its custom feeds and topic tags, with the goal of creating “casual spaces for you to share unique takes on topics like basketball or TV with other people who love them too.” The company has already created more than 100 communities around topics that already have large followings on the platform, like “NBA Threads,” “Book Threads” and “Tech Threads.” 

Several users have already reported seeing the feature and joining these spaces over the last few days. (Meta says that “leading voices” in these communities will get to add blue badges to their profiles to showcase their involvement in the groups.) 

For now, community feeds don’t look all that different from Threads’ topics feeds, but there are subtle differences. According to Meta, posts in communities will be ranked to surface more relevant posts higher up in the feed (the app’s current topic-based feeds tend to be more of a random jumble of posts from anyone who has tagged the topic). And, when you’re browsing a community’s feed, liking posts will trigger a custom emoji, like a basketball for the “NBA Threads” community.

Meta isn’t the first to try out the idea. Twitter created a communities feature back in 2021, and X said last year that the feature had seen a “495% jump” in “user active minutes.”Communities could also make Threads feel more cohesive. Since Threads’ algorithm so heavily emphasizes recommended posts from random, unconnected accounts, users have regularly complained about the app’s feed. Now, Meta says that the communities people join will also influence the content they see in their main feed, so joining more communities could also help tune its recommendations overall.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/threads-is-getting-a-communities-feature-for-better-conversations-170006903.html?src=rss 

A few years ago, Microsoft offered some of the best deals in gaming. The spartan Xbox Series S was well-priced at $300 (and you could often find it even cheaper if you hunted for deals). A $15 monthly subscription to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate offered a vast catalog of games new and old. But my, how things have changed in 2025.

The nearly five-year-old Xbox hardware lineup got not just one but two price bumps this year; the Series S with 512GB of storage now costs a whopping $400, while the Series X starts at $600 for a digital-only model or $650 with a disc drive — $150 and $100 than they retailed for just a few months ago. Adding insult to injury, Microsoft also jacked up the price of Game Pass Ultimate by 50 percent this week — it will soon cost $30 a month, up from $20. And that’s hardly the only price bump it has received recently — it was only $17 as recently as July of last year. It’s a positively wild move. 

Sure, Microsoft isn’t alone in increasing console pricing —  Nintendo is charging more for the ancient original Switch than ever before, and the Switch 2 is no bargain at $450. Sony also increased PS5 pricing this year, albeit to a less dramatic extent. It’s not a huge shock given the roller-coaster ride of uncertainty that is the US economy in 2025 (and for at least a few more years to come), but Microsoft’s approach feels egregious.

And that was before the Game Pass bump. It seems Microsoft is betting that increased revenue from die-hards will offset the inevitable losses from people who decide that the new price isn’t worth it. Subscriber inertia is definitely a real thing, and devoted Xbox owners who get a lot of use out of Game Pass may not bat an eye (or may forget to check their bank statements).

$30 for hundreds of games, as well as high-profile launch day availability for titles that would normally cost $70 or more each, is totally reasonable. By the same token, $30 or $40 for something like Apple Music would be more than fair when you consider how much purchasing a single album costs. (Not to mention fair compensation for all the artists involved in making music, or games, but that’s a story for another time.)

But in a desperate effort to get people signed up for music streaming, $10 a month became the industry standard. Sure, streaming services cost a few bucks more than that now, but they’ve thus far avoided the big price jumps we’re seeing in video and now game streaming. As the first big company to offer a subscription gaming catalog, Microsoft had a chance to set market rates — but to get as many people on board as possible, it seems like it aimed too low and is making up for it now.

And those who used to pay $15 or $18 or even $20 a month for Game Pass for years will likely struggle with this bump, no matter how devoted an Xbox gamer they are. A year of Game Pass now costs more than double the annual rate for a PlayStation Plus Platinum subscription. And while Sony still has no plans to bring high-profile, first-party studio games like Ghost of Yotei to its service on day one, the various PS Plus plans offer a ton of value without that. Especially for people who don’t need to play the hot new game the week it comes out.

For my part, I’ve been considering breaking up with Xbox for most of the year, and I think this will seal the deal. In a lot of ways, I was the exact target market for the Series S and Game Pass. There weren’t a ton of Xbox games I wanted to play, but there were enough I was curious about. So the combo of a reasonably-priced console and Game Pass was a great way to both try some new games and explore others I had missed.

Getting new players into the Xbox ecosystem feels like a massive challenge now with the prices we’re looking at. My year-one cost for an Xbox Series S and Game Pass was $480; it would be almost double now at $860. That is a positively brutal increase, and you can get far more for your money in the PlayStation ecosystem, to say nothing about Steam’s frequent (and often more generous) sales. And more and more former Xbox exclusives are coming to other consoles — like Forza Horizon 5, the game that got me to buy an Xbox in the first place. That’s yet another reason to not buy an Xbox, especially at these prices.

Sure, part of Microsoft’s strategy is that anything can be an Xbox, streaming games to your TV or set-top box. But you’ll need a really strong internet connection for that to be your only way to play games, and the kind of people who are going to shell out $30 for Game Pass are probably going to want the increased performance and fidelity that’ll come with a dedicated console. At the very least, though, game streaming is available on all Game Pass plans, so they’re making that part of the equation more accessible to more users.

Microsoft seems to have decided anything can be an Xbox without considering the people who already bought one. The new strategy appears to be shifting consumer costs away from hardware (which is usually a loss leader anyway) to its increasingly-expensive subscription service. That’s been a clear part of the Xbox plan for a while now, but people have come to expect a certain price point for things like Game Pass (regardless of whether or not that price is ethical). Now, Microsoft looks like it’s gouging Game Pass customers and leaves people who did buy into the Xbox ecosystem feeling taken advantage of.

The big bet is that fewer customers paying more will work out in the long run. I have no idea if that’s the right strategy — but I’m one gamer who won’t be sticking around to find out. I bet I’m not alone.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/xbox/why-im-breaking-up-with-xbox-160000545.html?src=rss 

Neon, a service that pays you for recordings of your phone calls and then sells those to AI companies for training data, seems set to return in the wake of a privacy breach. The app swiftly went viral after its debut, but it has been on ice since last week after a security flaw emerged. 

According to CNET, Neon founder Alex Kiam apologized for the incident in an email to users and said the app would return “soon.” It went offline after TechCrunch found users were able to access other people’s call recordings, along with transcripts and metadata. Neon pledged to add extra layers of security during the outage before making a comeback. 

While the app has been offline, users have been unable to cash out their payments. Neon pays them up to $30 per day for call recordings — 30 cents per minute for chats with other Neon users, and 15 cents per minute for calls with anyone else. It offers $30 for referring a newcomer to the app as well. 

In the email to users on Tuesday, Liam wrote that, “Your earnings have not disappeared — when we’re back online, we’ll pay you everything you’ve earned, plus a little bonus to thank you for your patience!” 

Neon says it only records the user’s side of the conversation when they place a call through the app. If the person on the other end is a Neon user as well, it records both sides of the chat. The company claims its tech automatically filters out personal information like names and phone numbers. Some privacy experts have warned people not to use Neon, in part because of potential pitfalls related to two-party consent laws for recording conversations in various jurisdictions.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/viral-app-neon-vows-to-return-to-sell-more-of-your-phone-calls-to-ai-companies-150233035.html?src=rss