Kalakshar US

If you’ve been thinking about hosting your own mini data center or need to stream 1,333 Netflix 4K programs at once, Google Fiber has the answer. The Alphabet-owned ISP will launch it’s 20Gbps service with Wi-Fi 7 in select cities early next year for $250 a month (plus taxes and applicable fees) — not that ridiculous of a price for such ridiculous speed. 

“We’re starting in Kansas City, North Carolina’s Triangle Region, Arizona, and Iowa,” the company wrote. “As we continue to roll out Nokia’s 25G PON across our network, we’ll open up invitations in new areas, so make sure you’ve let us know if you are interested in being the one of the first to have this in your home.”

As with Google’s other Fiber offerings, the 20Gbps speeds are symmetrical, so you’ll see them whether you’re uploading or downloading. Google notes that Wi-Fi 7, which offers peak wireless speeds of 40Gbps, is so bleeding-edge that it hasn’t even been fully certified yet. The service is being offered through Google’s GFiber Labs division, and is made possible by new Nokia 25G PONs (passive optical networks) installed as part of last-mile infrastructure upgrades. 

While obviously expensive, the new plan allows for some interesting possibilities. For instance, Google promises multi-gig internet speeds on multiple floors of your house, for example, thanks to the custom Wi-Fi 7 router co-created with Actiontec. That could let plan buyers amortize the price across multiple users — 20 people could have 1Gbps connections for $12.50 per month each, for instance. 

The new plan offers four times the speed of AT&T’s Elite 5Gbps fiber offering for the same $250 per month. However, Google Fiber’s problem has never been the technology or value proposition, but the availability. The company’s 5Gbps and 8Gbps plans only just got off the ground and are still only available in a few regions. While available in some major cities (San Franciso, Atlanta, San Antonio), Google Fiber is notably absent in key markets like New York City and Los Angeles. 

The 20Gbps plan will start rolling out in the above-mentioned cities in the first quarter of 2024. Just be aware that you’ll need the fastest Wi-Fi possible on your computer (currently Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 on select models) to even get a fraction of that maximum speed. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/googles-superfast-20gbps-wi-fi-7-fiber-plan-costs-250-a-month-095511377.html?src=rss 

Google has been working to phase out the Play Movies & TV brand and services ever since it launched its standalone TV app a few years ago. Now, the company seems to be making the last preparations for when Google Play Movies & TV goes away for good in January. As The Verge reports, the company has released detailed instructions on how long-time customers can continue accessing the content they’d already purchased. Admittedly, it can be a bit confusing, since access depends on what device the viewer is using. 

Starting on January 17, 2024, viewers will be able to access the movies and shows they’d purchased in the “Your Library” row under the Shop tab in Google Play… if they’re watching on TVs and streaming devices powered by Android TV. If they’re on Android TV cable or set-top boxes, they’ll be able to access their old content through the YouTube app, where they could also continue buying and renting movies and shows. On browsers, they will have to fire up the YouTube website to see their old purchases and borrow or buy new ones. 

These changes will be complete over the next few weeks, but we can confirm that they’ve already started rolling out, as we’re already seeing old movie buys on the YouTube website.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/google-begins-shifting-users-from-play-movies–tv-ahead-of-its-january-shutdown-085837698.html?src=rss 

Tesla could sue at least some Cybertruck owners who flip their vehicles too soon, but it’s unclear if the rule applies to all customers who buy the pickup truck and if it will remain in place for future buyers. A few weeks before the first deliveries for the Cybertruck went out, Tesla updated its purchase agreement to add that it could seek injunctive relief to prevent owners from transferring their vehicle’s title if they attempt to sell it within one year of buying it. Further, the company said it could seek “liquidated damages” from customers worth “$50,000 or the value received as consideration for the sale or transfer, whichever is greater.”

Shortly after the information made the rounds on social media, though, Tesla removed the clause as quietly as it had added it. Now, as Electrek reports, Cybertruck customers who have managed to put in an order for the $120,000 Foundation Series configuration have received an order agreement with the controversial clause still clearly in place. Based on the copy posted by customers on the Cybertruck Owners Club forum, buyers are agreeing not to sell their vehicles within the first year of purchase. If owners must flip their vehicles before the year is up, Tesla is asking them to notify the company, which will then purchase it back for retail minus 25 cents per mile driven and minus the cost of wear and tear, as well as the cost to repair any damages.. They could only sell their Cybertruck without getting in trouble with Tesla if the automaker declines to buy their vehicle and gives them written consent to sell it to a third party. 

Other automakers, particularly luxury brands like Ferrari and Porsche, enforce a similar rule. In Tesla’s case, the company has yet to clarify whether it will apply to all Cybertruck buyers or if it will only enforce the rule for Foundation Series owners. Regardless, fans may want to look over their purchase agreements if they buy a Cybertruck, because Tesla may refuse to sell them any more vehicles in the future if they break the rule. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/tesla-could-still-sue-cybertruck-owners-if-they-flip-their-vehicles-too-soon-075724926.html?src=rss 

The Day Before was a much-hyped zombie shooter game which, after multiple delays, launched on Steam on December 7th, only to be widely criticized for failing to deliver an MMO (massively multiplayer online) experience as advertised, let alone its bugginess, lack of originality and seemingly intentional slow in-game progress. Four days later, Fntastic, the studio behind this controversial title, abruptly announced its closure as this $40 game “has failed financially,” despite having apparently sold over 200,000 copies before refunds, according to PC Gamer. 

“We did everything within our power, but unfortunately, we miscalculated our capabilities,” added Fntastic, which has since removed all of its over-promising trailers from its YouTube channel.

Gamers who paid for the disastrous early access are understandably livid. Fortunately, Steam does offer a two-week window for refund requests, so long as the game has only been played for less than two hours. Even if you, for some reason, have already played The Day Before for more than two hours, it’s likely that Steam will still honor your refund, as suggested by an announcement from publisher Mytona. A handful of comments also seem to confirm that those players were able to get their refunds, despite having worked their way through the disappointing title for over two hours. 

Head over to Steam Help, go to “Purchases,” click on The Day Before, then under the “What problem are you having with this product?” section, pick whatever reason you deem suitable (probably “Gameplay or technical issue,” in this case) to proceed with your refund request. Good luck.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/how-to-get-a-refund-for-the-day-before-the-game-that-got-canned-in-just-four-days-045153224.html?src=rss 

Epic Games’ lawsuit against Google has had a much different turnout from its courtroom battle with Apple. A federal jury has sided with the video game developer and has found Google to be in violation of US antitrust laws when it comes to how it runs the Play Store. According to The Verge, the jury has unanimously agreed that Google held an illegal monopoly on app distribution and in-app billing services for Android devices. Further, it found the company’s distribution agreements with other video gaming companies, as well as its deals with device manufacturers to pre-install its apps on Android devices, to be anticompetitive. 

In its complaint, Epic said that Google had silently paid game developers hundreds of millions of dollars to make their titles downloadable from the Play Store in an initiative that was originally known as “Project Hug.” It alleged that the company had paid Activision Blizzard $360 million to abandon its plans of creating a competing app store, which the game developer subsequently denied. Google, which Epic said came up with the incentive program after it released Fortnite outside of the Play Store, also reportedly inked deals with Nintendo, Ubisoft and Riot Games. 

The jury has come to the conclusion that Epic Games has been negatively affected by Google’s actions, but we’ve yet to know how its victory will change the latter’s practices. In a statement posted on X, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said the court will start “work[ing] on remedies” in January. Judge James Donato, who’s overseeing the case, will be making the decision whether to order Google to give developers the freedom to introduce their own app stores and billing systems for Android devices. In the case of Epic’s lawsuit against Apple, the court ruled that the iPhone-maker didn’t violate US antitrust laws, but it ordered the company to allow App Store developers to direct customers through third-party payment systems. 

Google, however, doesn’t intend to go down without a fight. Wilson White, Google VP for Government Affairs and Public Policy, told Engadget that the company plans to challenge the verdict. “Android and Google Play provide more choice and openness than any other major mobile platform,” White said. “The trial made clear that we compete fiercely with Apple and its App Store, as well as app stores on Android devices and gaming consoles. We will continue to defend the Android business model and remain deeply committed to our users, partners, and the broader Android ecosystem.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/jury-sides-with-epic-games-in-its-antitrust-lawsuit-against-google-032341810.html?src=rss