Kalakshar US

Spotify first revealed its plan to roll out a high-fidelity option for music streaming some years ago, but that still hasn’t come to pass. This may finally be the year when the company’s HiFi streaming goes live, but you’ll likely need to pay extra for the privilege.

HiFi streaming is expected to arrive by the end of 2024 and it will be an add-on that costs users at least $5 more per month on top of an existing plan, according to Bloomberg. That’s in addition to a Premium price increase that takes effect next month. As such, individual users who want to listen to high-fidelity music on Spotify may need to pay at least $17 per month, unless they’re fortunate enough to be on the $6 student plan. It’s not clear if the HiFi add-on will be available to those on the free tier.

HiFi audio is already factored into Apple Music ($11 per month for individuals) and Amazon Music Unlimited ($11 per month for those without Prime). It was a key selling point for Tidal at the outset of that service, which also now costs $11 per month. That places Spotify, which said in 2021 it would roll out its HiFi plan that year, well behind its rivals on that front.

That said, the so-called “Supremium” add-on is said to include other features, like an option to spin up custom playlists in a flash based on specific activities, dates and times of the year. Bloomberg reports that Spotify’s tech will adjust playlists based on a user’s behavior and eventually automatically create playlists without any input from them.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/spotifys-hifi-plan-could-finally-arrive-this-year-but-you-may-need-to-pay-extra-141610374.html?src=rss 

One of the bigger selling points of Apple’s AirPods for some people is their unsealed design, which means they rest just outside of your ear canal instead of inserting all the way in. Open-style earbuds like these aren’t good at blocking out ambient noise as a result, but they tend to be more comfortable to wear for those with sensitive ears.

AirPods aren’t exactly cheap, though. If this idea sounds appealing but you’re on a tighter budget, the latest Amazon Echo Buds are a similar alternative that we recommend in our guide to the best budget earbuds. They normally cost $50, but a new deal at Amazon has dropped them back down to $35. That matches the lowest price we’ve tracked.

We gave the Echo Buds a score of 77 in our review last year. So long as you’re OK with earbuds that don’t totally seal off your ear canal, they’re a good value when they’re discounted to this extent. We found they needed a slight bit of EQ tweaking to sound their best — the treble range was a bit too hot out of the box — but Amazon’s Alexa app makes that simple enough. Once you dial them in, they sound perfectly decent for a sub-$50 pair of unsealed earbuds. You won’t get much in the way of deep bass, as usual with open-style headphones, but there’s at least some rumble and enough separation to keep tracks from sounding overly congested. 

The earbuds themselves are lightweight and comfortable in the ear, and their included charging case is easy to slip into a pocket. Unlike many cheap earbuds, they support wear detection — so they’ll automatically pause when you remove an earbud — and the ability to connect to two devices at once. Call quality is passable, if unremarkable, while the customizable touch controls are generally reliable. Naturally, you can also access Alexa hands-free, though it’s possible to mute the built-in mics if you want nothing to do with that voice assistant.

These are still cheap earbuds, to be clear, so they come with their share of trade-offs. Battery life is mediocre, for one, usually tapping out around five hours. The pair only has an IPX2 water- and dust-resistance rating, so they’re not well-suited for sweaty workouts. There’s no charging cable in the box, and the Alexa app, while fairly well-featured, is more bloated than other companion apps we’ve tested. Annoyingly, you also need to register with the Alexa app just to set the Echo Buds up. And again, don’t get an open-style pair like this if you’re looking for noise cancellation. Still, while there’s a chance we see a lower price during Amazon’s Prime Day sale next month, this is a solid deal for the right person right now.

Follow @EngadgetDeals on Twitter and subscribe to the Engadget Deals newsletter for the latest tech deals and buying advice.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/the-latest-amazon-echo-buds-are-back-on-sale-for-35-142612419.html?src=rss 

Spotify has launched a new campaign that’s meant to make users’ audio streaming experience on the platform even more personalized. The “My Spotify” initiative will show users home page banners and personalized messages within the app that contain information about their listening habits, along with links to mixes that they’d presumably enjoy based on those habits. In one of the examples above, for instance, Spotify presented a user with a banner that links to a Doja Cat mix, because they’ve listened to the rapper’s tracks 58 times over the past month. 

The service showed the user a banner that links to a DJ mix of Go Gina in another example, demonstrating how the messages can be personalized for every listener. A My Spotify banner or message could also link to the “Made For You” hub, where users can find personalized playlists, podcasts, features and recommendations based on their activity on the app. 

My Spotify gives the service a way to present users with data of their listening habits around the year, outside of Wrapped. The company’s year-in-review feature only goes live during the holiday season, and it takes over social media when it does. It’s not quite clear if users will also be able to share their My Spotify messages and banners on social networks. Spotify also didn’t say whether it’ll make its way to everyone on the app in the future — it only announced that the feature “will appear first” in the US, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand over the next several weeks. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/spotify-will-start-showing-you-personalized-banners-and-messages-based-on-your-listening-habits-130007917.html?src=rss 

Thrasher, which its developers describe as a “mind-melting arcade action odyssey,” will be available for the Meta Quest and the Apple Vision Pro on July 25. The SteamVR version will follow at a later date. Thrasher was first announced at The Game Awards last year as a new project by Brian Gibson, who was the artist and composer behind the nightmare-inducing rhythm game Thumper. For Thrasher, Gibson teamed up with Mike Mandel, known for working on games like Rock Band VR and Fuser, who took charge of the coding and research and development. 

The player takes control of a space eel in Thrasher, which they have to guide with “fast-paced gesture controls” through unsettling landscapes, so that it can evolve and defeat a cosmic baby god by the end of their journey. Based on the images and teasers the developers have released so far, the game’s environments truly do look mind-bending with their psychedelic neon colors and their geometric patterns. Even the eel’s powers sound trippy: Players can fight bosses with a rainbow spray of bullets or bulldoze environment elements in a blaze of color and light. 

The developers said that Thrasher’s “music, visuals, and gameplay mesh into one transcendent experience” for the player. While the virtual reality version offers the most immersive option for gamers, Thrasher is also expected to be available for consoles and PC in the future

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/thrasher-the-psychedelic-game-from-the-artist-behind-thumper-arrives-in-july-133026724.html?src=rss 

Following customer outrage over its latest terms of service (ToS), Adobe is making updates to add more detail around areas like of AI and content ownership, the company said in a blog post. “Your content is yours and will never be used to train any generative AI tool,” wrote head of product Scott Belsky and VP of legal and policy Dana Rao. 

Subscribers using products like Photoshop, Premiere Pro and Lightroom were incensed by new, vague language they interpreted to mean that Adobe could freely use their work to train the company’s generative AI models. In other words, creators thought that Adobe could use AI to effectively rip off their work and then resell it. 

Other language was thought to mean that the company could actually take ownership of users’ copyrighted material (understandably so, when you see it). 

None of that was accurate, Adobe said, noting that the new terms of use were put in place for its product improvement program and content moderation for legal reasons, mostly around CSAM. However, many users didn’t see it that way and Belsky admitted that the company “could have been clearer” with the updated ToS.

“In a world where customers are anxious about how their data is used, and how generative AI models are trained, it is the responsibility of companies that host customer data and content to declare their policies not just publicly, but in their legally binding Terms of Use,” Belsky said. 

To that end, the company promised to overhaul the ToS using “more plain language and examples to help customers understand what [ToS clauses] mean and why we have them,” it wrote.

Adobe didn’t help its own cause by releasing an update on June 6th with some minor changes to the same vague language as the original ToS and no sign of an apology. That only seemed to fuel the fire more, with subscribers to its Creative Cloud service threatening to quit en masse. 

In addition, Adobe claims that it only trains its Firefly system on Adobe Stock images. However, multiple artists have noted that their names are used as search terms in Adobe’s stock footage site, as Creative Bloq reported. The results yield AI-generated art that occasionally mimics the artists’ styles. 

Its latest post is more of a true mea culpa with a detailed explanation of what it plans to change. Along with the AI and copyright areas, the company emphasized that users can opt out of its product improvement programs and that it will more “narrowly tailor” licenses to the activities required. It added that it only scans data on the cloud and never looks at locally stored content. Finally, Adobe said it will be listening to customer feedback around the new changes.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/adobe-is-updating-its-terms-of-service-following-a-backlash-over-recent-changes-120044152.html?src=rss